Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087923›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

The faculty-to-faculty mentorship experience: a survey on challenges and recommendations for improvements.

Sarvenaz Sarabipour, Natalie M Niemi, Steven J Burgess, Christopher T Smith, Alexandre W Bisson Filho, Ahmed Ibrahim, Kelly Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarvenaz SarabipourInstitute for Computational Medicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5097-5509
Natalie M NiemiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-4005
Steven J BurgessCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology and Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2353-7794
Christopher T SmithOffice of Research and Innovation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-7886
Alexandre W Bisson FilhoDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-7230
Ahmed IbrahimCenter for Teaching Excellence and Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kelly ClarkCenter for Teaching Excellence and Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2327631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faculty at research institutions play a central role in advancing knowledge and careers, as well as promoting the well-being of students and colleagues in research environments. Mentorship from experienced peers has been touted as critical for enabling these myriad roles to allow faculty development, career progression, and satisfaction. However, there is little information available on who supports faculty and best ways to structure a faculty mentorship programme for early- and mid-career academics. In the interest of advocating for increased and enhanced faculty mentoring and mentoring programmes, we surveyed faculty around the world to gather data on whether and how they receive mentoring. We received responses from 457 early- and mid-career faculty and found that a substantial portion of respondents either reported having no mentor or a lack of a formal mentoring scheme. Qualitative responses on the quality of mentorship revealed that the most common complaints regarding mentorship included lack of mentor availability, unsatisfactory commitment to mentorship, and non-specific or non-actionable advice. On these suggestions, we identify a need for training for faculty mentors as well as strategies for individual mentors, departments, and institutions for funding and design of more intentional and supportive mentorship programmes for early- and mid-career faculty.

Indexed as

MentoringMentorsFacultyHumansStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesearly careersfaculty developmentmentoringmentorship programmespeer mentoringresearch culture

Identifiers

PMID38087923
PMCPMC10716655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.