Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087312›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

Assessing the impact of transplant site on ovarian tissue transplantation: a single-arm meta-analysis.

Baoli Xie, Jiaxu Li, Yingqin Huang, Fu Hang, Qianwen Hu, Jiaxin Yu, Aiping Qin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Advances in ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplanta-tion for fertility preservation in prepubertal patients].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Baoli XieCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jiaxu LiCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Yingqin HuangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangxi, Guangxi, 530021, China.
Fu HangCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Qianwen HuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jiaxin YuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Aiping QinCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China. qinaiping@gxmu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNGuangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival rates of young women undergoing cancer treatment have substantially improved, with a focus on post-treatment quality of life. Ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is a viable option to preserve fertility; however, there is no consensus on the optimal transplantation site. Most studies on OTT are nonrandomized controlled trials with limited sample sizes and uncontrolled statistical analyses, leaving the question of which transplant site yields the highest chance of achieving a live birth unanswered.

objectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of different ovarian transplant sites on postoperative reproductive outcomes.

methodsWe adhered to the PRISMA Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 17, 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) women who underwent OTT with a desire for future childbirth, and (2) reports of specific transplant sites and corresponding pregnancy outcomes. The exclusion criteria included the inability to isolate or extract relevant outcome data, case reports, non-original or duplicate data, and articles not written in English.

resultsTwelve studies (201 women) were included in the meta-analysis of cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) after OTT. The CLBR, which encompasses both spontaneous pregnancies and those achieved through assisted reproductive technology (ART) following OTT to the ovarian site, was 21% (95% CI: 6-40, I

conclusionPregnancy outcomes were not significantly different after orthotopic ovarian transplantation, and pregnancy and live birth rates after orthotopic OTT were significantly higher than those after ectopic transplantation. REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202390008.

Indexed as

OvaryQuality of LifeFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy, MultiplePregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedOvarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)Ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT)Reproductive outcomesSingle-arm meta-analysisTransplant sites

Identifiers

PMID38087312
PMCPMC10714583
OpenAlexW4389609219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.