ArticleBMC medicine2023
Construction of a risk stratification model integrating ctDNA to predict response and survival in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer.
Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple time points for detecting circulating tumor DNA to monitor the response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of various physical therapies on pain, fatigue, quality of life and functional impairment in breast cancer survivors: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- An interpretable breast cancer risk stratification model via multi-omics integration: multi-method development and cross-cohort validation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence integrated multi-omics and multimodal studies promote the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Review
- Emerging technologies for monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic scoping review.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Review of ctDNA in breast cancer - present utility and future perspectives.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026Review
- Current perspectives on circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- Personalized circulating tumor DNA dynamics inform survival and response to immune checkpoint blockade in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Adapting Immunotherapy Approaches in Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Integrated analysis of oral rinse-derived and plasma circulating tumour DNA for mutation profiling and outcome prediction with oral squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response in solid tumors and advance precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical Management of Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: Detection, Prediction, and Monitoring.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- Prognostic utility of inflammatory indices and circulating nucleic acids for neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in breast cancer: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA fraction predicts residual cancer burden post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Article
- The potential role of breast MRI in evaluation of triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma of less than 3 cm.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer is closely related to a better prognosis. However, there are no reliable indicators to accurately identify which patients will achieve pCR before surgery, and a model for predicting pCR to NAC is required.
methodsA total of 269 breast cancer patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Liaocheng People's Hospital receiving anthracycline and taxane-based NAC were prospectively enrolled. Expression profiling using a 457 cancer-related gene sequencing panel (DNA sequencing) covering genes recurrently mutated in breast cancer was carried out on 243 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies samples before NAC from 243 patients. The unique personalized panel of nine individual somatic mutation genes from the constructed model was used to detect and analyze ctDNA on 216 blood samples. Blood samples were collected at indicated time points including before chemotherapy initiation, after the 1
resultsFirstly, we constructed a predictive NAC response model including five single nucleotide variant (SNV) mutations (TP53, SETBP1, PIK3CA, NOTCH4 and MSH2) and four copy number variation (CNV) mutations (FOXP1-gain, EGFR-gain, IL7R-gain, and NFKB1A-gain) in the breast tumor, combined with three clinical factors (luminal A, Her2 and Ki67 status). The tumor prediction model showed good discrimination of chemotherapy sensitivity for pCR and non-pCR with an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.797-0.927) in the training set, 0.771 (95% CI, 0.649-0.883) in the test set, and 0.726 (95% CI, 0.556-0.865) in an extra test set. This tumor prediction model can also effectively predict the prognosis of disease-free survival (DFS) with an AUC of 0.749 at 1 year and 0.830 at 3 years. We further screened the genes from the tumor prediction model to establish a unique personalized panel consisting of 9 individual somatic mutation genes to detect and analyze ctDNA. It was found that ctDNA positivity decreased with the passage of time during NAC, and ctDNA status can predict NAC response and metastasis recurrence. Finally, we constructed the chemotherapy prediction model combined with the tumor prediction model and pretreatment ctDNA levels, which has a better prediction effect of pCR with the AUC value of 0.961.
conclusionsIn this study, we established a chemotherapy predictive model with a non-invasive tool that is built based on genomic features, ctDNA status, as well as clinical characteristics for predicting pCR to recognize the responders and non-responders to NAC, and also predicting prognosis for DFS in breast cancer. Adding pretreatment ctDNA levels to a model containing gene profile mutation and clinical characteristics significantly improves stratification over the clinical variables alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.