Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087256›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Clinical features and imaging examination assessment of cervical lymph nodes for thyroid carcinoma.

Bei Wei, Jincao Yao, Chanjuan Peng, Shanshan Zhao, Hui Wang, Liping Wang, Xi Zhu, Yuting Kong, Liyu Chen, Dong Xu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of a simple positioning aid device on the diagnostic performance of thyroid cancer in CT scans: a randomized controlled trial.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bei Wei *Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jincao Yao *Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chanjuan Peng *Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Shanshan ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Liping WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xi ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yuting KongDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China.
Liyu ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China. chenly787@zjcc.org.cn.
Dong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang Province, China. xudong@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071946Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LSD19H180001Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY20H180001Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LZY21F030001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsThe purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between clinical characteristics and cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with thyroid carcinoma, as well as estimate the preoperative diagnosis values of ultrasound (US) and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations on the neck for detection of cervical LNM in thyroid carcinoma.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 3 026 patients with surgically proven thyroid carcinoma was conducted. Patients' clinical characteristics, including gender, age, tumor size, bilateral lesions, multifocality, adenomatous nodules, Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and extrathyroidal extension, were collected to explore their association with cervical LNM in thyroid carcinoma. Preoperative assessments for central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) were conducted through US and CECT. The diagnostic value of US, CECT and US combined with CECT for detection of LNM located in various cervical compartments was estimated based on the pathological results.

resultsThe risk of cervical LNM was higher in thyroid cancer patients who were male, age < 55 years old, tumor size > 10 mm, bilateral lesions, and extrathyroidal extension, while multifocality, adenomatous nodules and HT had no significant effect on LNM. US, CECT and US combined with CECT all had a higher sensitivity to LLNM (93.1%, 57.8%, 95.4%) than to CLNM (32.3%, 29.0%, 43.4%). US and CECT had a high specificity to both CLNM and LLNM (94.3-97.8%).

conclusionPreoperative clinical characteristics and imaging examinations on patients with thyroid carcinoma are crucial to the evaluation of cervical lymph nodes and conducive to individualizing surgical treatments by clinicians. US combined with CECT are superior to single US or CECT alone in detection of CLNM and LLNM.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThyroid Cancer, PapillaryCervical lymph node MetastasisClinical characteristicsCTThyroid carcinomaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38087256
PMCPMC10717540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.