Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087245›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam compared with propofol in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a single-center, randomized, controlled study.

Yaqi Huang, Ting Yan, Guiting Lu, Huirong Luo, Zhongmeng Lai, Liangcheng Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaqi HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Ting YanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Guiting LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Huirong LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Zhongmeng LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Liangcheng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China. zlc0567@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Comfort Medical Research Project of Fujian Strait Medical 2020-HYH-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemimazolam, as a novel anesthetic, has recently been shown to improve hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and maintenance; however, it has not been reported in the hypertensive population. This study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

methodsWe enrolled 120 hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in this prospective study and randomly allocated them to remimazolam (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60) groups. Anesthesia regimens were consistent between groups, except for the administration of remimazolam and propofol. Our primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, which was either an absolute mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg or a > 30% relative drop in MAP compared to baseline within 20 min of induction or from induction to the start of surgery. Secondary outcomes included minimum MAP and MAP at different time points during anesthesia, the application of vasoactive drugs, adverse events, and the patient's self-reported Quality of Recovery-40 scale for the day after surgery.

resultsThe incidence of post-induction hypotension was lower and the minimum MAP during induction was higher in the remimazolam group than those in the propofol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the remaining outcomes.

conclusionRemimazolam is safe and effective in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Induction with remimazolam in hypertensive patients may result in more stable hemodynamics than propofol.

trial registrationThis study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 03/12/2020, with registration number ChiCTR2000040579.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHypotensionPropofolAnesthesia, GeneralBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamAnesthesiaBreast cancer SurgeryHemodynamicsHypertensive patientPropofolRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID38087245
PMCPMC10714447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.