ArticleBMC primary care2023
Where the joy comes from: a qualitative exploration of deep GP-patient relationships.
Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing a primary-tertiary shared care model for enhancing cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type III pre-post study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Can Adhering to Clinical Communication Guidelines Promote Trust, Liking and Respect for General Practitioners and Willingness to Discuss Depression? A Theory-Based Test.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transforming Dental Care Through Empathetic and Clear Communication: A Comprehensive Review and Implementation Framework.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- The Relationships Between Healthcare Access, Gender, and Psychedelics and Their Effects on Distress.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Coordinated empathy in attending general practitioners: an interpretive phenomenological approach to constructing a conceptual model of empathy.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Why Do Primary Care Patients Change Their Physicians: An Overview of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Breaking Barriers Transforming Primary Care to Serve the Physical Health Needs of Individuals With SMI in the NHS.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Discussing poverty within primary care consultations: implications for mental health support.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Experiences of group antenatal care in the context of the NHS in England: what are the mechanisms by which it functions in this context?Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Personality and interest in general practice: results from an online survey among medical students.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Concordance in the healthcare context: A concept analysis.Belitung nursing journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRelationship-based, whole person care is foundational to quality general practice. Previous research has identified several characteristics of deep General Practitioner (GP)-patient relationships and their association with improved patient concordance, satisfaction and perceived health outcomes. Psychological attachment theory has been used to understand therapeutic relationships, but has only been explored to a limited extent in the general practice context. Additionally, evolving changes in sociocultural and commercial practice contexts may threaten relationship-based care. In view of this, we aimed to explore the nature and experience of deep GP-patient relationships, as identified by patients, from GP and patient perspectives.
methodsSemi-structured interview design. An initial survey assessed patients' perceived depth of their relationship with their GP, using the Health Care Provider Attachment Figure Survey and Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship Scale. Patients who reported a deep relationship, and their GPs, were purposively selected for individual interviews exploring their experience of these relationships. A post-interview survey assessed interviewees' attachment styles, using the Modified and Brief Experiences in Close Relationships Scale. Patient interviewees also rated the patient-centredness of their GP's clinic using the Person-Centred Primary Care Measure. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsThirteen patients and five GPs were interviewed. Four themes characterised deep relationships: the 'professional'; human connection; trust; and 'above and beyond'. Patient, GP and practice team all contributed to their cultivation.
conclusionsWe present a revised conceptual framework of deep GP-patient relationships. Deep relationships come to the fore in times of patient trouble. Like attachment relationships, they provide a sense of safety, caring and support for patients experiencing vulnerability. They can stretch GP boundaries and capacity for self-care, but also provide joy and vocational satisfaction. Patients may not always desire or need deep relationships with their GP. However, findings highlight the importance of enabling and cultivating these for times of patient hardship, and challenges of doing so within current healthcare climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.