Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087212›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Where the joy comes from: a qualitative exploration of deep GP-patient relationships.

Hayley Thomas, Johanna Lynch, Emily Burch, Megan Best, Lauren Ball, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Nancy Sturman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Why Do Primary Care Patients Change Their Physicians: An Overview of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hayley ThomasGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 8, UQ Health Sciences Building (Building 16/901), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. h.thomas@uq.edu.au.
Johanna LynchGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 8, UQ Health Sciences Building (Building 16/901), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Emily BurchFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Megan BestInstitute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lauren BallCentre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
Elizabeth SturgissSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Nancy SturmanGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 8, UQ Health Sciences Building (Building 16/901), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.

Funding

RACGP Foundation FMCER2021-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelationship-based, whole person care is foundational to quality general practice. Previous research has identified several characteristics of deep General Practitioner (GP)-patient relationships and their association with improved patient concordance, satisfaction and perceived health outcomes. Psychological attachment theory has been used to understand therapeutic relationships, but has only been explored to a limited extent in the general practice context. Additionally, evolving changes in sociocultural and commercial practice contexts may threaten relationship-based care. In view of this, we aimed to explore the nature and experience of deep GP-patient relationships, as identified by patients, from GP and patient perspectives.

methodsSemi-structured interview design. An initial survey assessed patients' perceived depth of their relationship with their GP, using the Health Care Provider Attachment Figure Survey and Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship Scale. Patients who reported a deep relationship, and their GPs, were purposively selected for individual interviews exploring their experience of these relationships. A post-interview survey assessed interviewees' attachment styles, using the Modified and Brief Experiences in Close Relationships Scale. Patient interviewees also rated the patient-centredness of their GP's clinic using the Person-Centred Primary Care Measure. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThirteen patients and five GPs were interviewed. Four themes characterised deep relationships: the 'professional'; human connection; trust; and 'above and beyond'. Patient, GP and practice team all contributed to their cultivation.

conclusionsWe present a revised conceptual framework of deep GP-patient relationships. Deep relationships come to the fore in times of patient trouble. Like attachment relationships, they provide a sense of safety, caring and support for patients experiencing vulnerability. They can stretch GP boundaries and capacity for self-care, but also provide joy and vocational satisfaction. Patients may not always desire or need deep relationships with their GP. However, findings highlight the importance of enabling and cultivating these for times of patient hardship, and challenges of doing so within current healthcare climates.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersFamily PracticeHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAttachment theoryGeneral practiceGeneral practitioner-patient relationshipPrimary careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38087212
PMCPMC10717859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.