ArticleBMC geriatrics2023
Impact of age on mortality and transfer to long-term care in patients in an intensive care unit.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Intensive care of elderly patients : Core nursing responsibilities and central care priorities].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Age-Adjusted Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation Score in Predicting Long-Term Survival in COPD-Related Persistent Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The 1-year trajectory of older patients transferred from an intensive care unit to an acute geriatric unit.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the global trend of population aging, age is one of the significant factors to be considered in critically ill patients. However, the impact of age on clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis in this population varies across different studies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis for patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) (30 beds) between January 2017 and December 2020 at the tertiary referral hospital in Korea. Patients were classified into three groups according to age: <65 years, old age (65-79 years), and very old age (≥ 80 years). Subsequently, enrolled patients were analyzed for acute mortality and long-term prognosis.
resultsAmong the 1584 patients, the median age was 67.0 (57.0-76.0) years, and 65.2% were male. Median ICU length of stay (LOS) (8, 9, and 10 days in < 65, 65-79, and ≥ 80 years, respectively; p = 0.006) and the proportion of patients who were transferred to long-term care hospital at the time of discharge (12.9% vs. 28.3% vs. 39.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) increased with age. Multivariable logistic analysis showed no significant difference in the 28-day mortality in the old age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.17) and very old age (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.71-1.55) groups compared to that in patients with age < 65 years. However, the relevance of the proportion of ICU LOS ≥ 7 days and transfers to other hospitals after discharge increased with age.
conclusionsAge did not affect acute mortality in critical illness patients. However, surviving older age groups required more long-term care facilities compared to patients younger than 65 years after acute management. These results indicate that in an aging society, the importance of not only acute management but also long-term care facilities may increase for critical illness patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.