ArticleBehavior research methods2024
forager: a Python package and web interface for modeling mental search.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lexical Search and Retrieval in Aphasia: A Computational Analysis of Semantic Fluency.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Category fluency and creative potential in semantic aphasia.Journal of neuropsychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyzing data from the verbal fluency task (e.g., "name all the animals you can in a minute") is of interest to both memory researchers and clinicians due to its broader implications for memory search and retrieval. Recent work has proposed several computational models to examine nuanced differences in search behavior, which can provide insights into the mechanisms underlying memory search. A prominent account of memory search within the fluency task was proposed by Hills et al. (2012), where mental search is modeled after how animals forage for food in physical space. Despite the broad potential utility of these models to scientists and clinicians, there is currently no open-source program to apply and compare existing foraging models or clustering algorithms without extensive, often redundant programming. To remove this barrier to studying search patterns in the fluency task, we created forager, a Python package ( https://github.com/thelexiconlab/forager ) and web interface ( https://forager.research.bowdoin.edu/ ). forager provides multiple automated methods to designate clusters and switches within a fluency list, implements a novel set of computational models that can examine the influence of multiple lexical sources (semantic, phonological, and frequency) on memory search using semantic embeddings, and also enables researchers to evaluate relative model performance at the individual and group level. The package and web interface cater to users with various levels of programming experience. In this work, we introduce forager's basic functionality and use cases that demonstrate its utility with pre-existing behavioral and clinical data sets of the semantic fluency task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38087144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.