Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087116›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2023

Benefits and harms of cervical screening, triage and treatment strategies in women living with HIV.

Michaela T Hall, Kate T Simms, John M Murray, Adam Keane, Diep T N Nguyen, Michael Caruana, Gigi Lui, Helen Kelly, Linda O Eckert, Nancy Santesso and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Strategic approaches for global cervical cancer elimination: An update review and call for national action.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Michaela T HallDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. michaela.hall@nswcc.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8989-1449
Kate T SimmsDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-7956
John M MurraySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adam KeaneDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Diep T N NguyenDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael CaruanaDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-6552
Gigi LuiDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Helen KellyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
Linda O EckertDepartment of Global Health and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nancy SantessoDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Silvia de SanjoseDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Edwin E SwaiUniversal Health Coverage and Life Course Cluster, World Health Organization, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ajay RangarajDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Morkor Newman OwireduDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cindy GauvreauChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Owen DemkeGlobal Diagnostics, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Kigali, Rwanda.
Partha BasuEarly Detection Prevention and Infections, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Marc ArbynCancer Epidemiology Unit, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Shona DalalDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie BroutetDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karen CanfellDaffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUWorld Health Organization · CHCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRGhent University · BEHospital for Sick Children · CAImpact · CANational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Washington · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To support a strategy to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reviewed its guidelines for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancerous lesions in 2021. Women living with HIV have 6-times the risk of cervical cancer compared to women in the general population, and we harnessed a model platform ('Policy1-Cervix-HIV') to evaluate the benefits and harms of a range of screening strategies for women living with HIV in Tanzania, a country with endemic HIV. Assuming 70% coverage, we found that 3-yearly primary HPV screening without triage would reduce age-standardised cervical cancer mortality rates by 72%, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 38.7, to prevent a cervical cancer death. Triaging HPV positive women before treatment resulted in minimal loss of effectiveness and had more favorable NNTs (19.7-33.0). Screening using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or cytology was less effective than primary HPV and, in the case of VIA, generated a far higher NNT of 107.5. These findings support the WHO 2021 recommendation that women living with HIV are screened with primary HPV testing in a screen-triage-and-treat approach starting at 25 years, with regular screening every 3-5 years.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansTriageAcetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID38087116
PMCPMC10719091
OpenAlexW4389624770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.