SynthesisJournal of prevention (2022)2024
Predictors of Control Status of Hypertension in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of prevention (2022), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictors of hypertension (HTN) control status have not been well understood in India. This information is crucial for policymakers and program managers to devise newer HTN control strategies and implement relevant policies and programs. Therefore, we undertook this meta-analysis to estimate the effect of various factors on the control status of HTN in India. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies and community-based trials published between April 2013 and March 2021 conducted among people (≥ 15 years) with hypertension in India. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa (NO) scale. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model. We reported the effect of various factors on the prevalence of controlled HTN using pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Of the 842 studies screened, we analyzed nine studies that included 2,441 individuals. Based on the NO scale, majority (90%) of studies had a low risk of bias. The odds of having controlled HTN were significantly higher among women (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.62-1.95), those aged > 45 years (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.44-1.97), and those residing in urban parts of India (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.48-2.03). These measures varied considerably across different regions of the country. Very few studies reported data on the relationship between behavioural risk factors of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and HTN control status. We did not find any statistically significant differences between behavioural risk factors of NCDs and HTN control status. To improve HTN control in India, the ongoing/newer HTN control programs need to target men, those aged 15-45, and rural residents. Future studies on HTN control determinants should report disaggregated data and use standardized definitions for behavioral risk factors to enhance reliability and comprehensiveness of findings on the determinants of HTN control in future reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38087106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.