Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38087082›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2024

Automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture and sample preparation for 3D live-cell microscopy.

Benjamin W Gregor, Mackenzie E Coston, Ellen M Adams, Joy Arakaki, Antoine Borensztejn, Thao P Do, Margaret A Fuqua, Amanda Haupt, Melissa C Hendershott, Winnie Leung and 13 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin W Gregor *Allen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mackenzie E Coston *Allen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ellen M AdamsAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5074-5556
Joy ArakakiAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Antoine BorensztejnAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thao P DoAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Margaret A FuquaAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda HauptAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa C HendershottAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Winnie LeungAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Irina A MuellerAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aditya NathAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Angelique M NelsonAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susanne M RafelskiAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emmanuel E SanchezAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Madison J Swain-BowdenAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
W Joyce TangAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Derek J ThirstrupAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Winfried WiegraebeAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian P WhitneyAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Calysta YanAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ruwanthi N GunawardaneAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nathalie GaudreaultAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, WA, USA. nathalieg@alleninstitute.org.
Allen Institute for Cell Science · USAllen Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To produce abundant cell culture samples to generate large, standardized image datasets of human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells, we developed an automated workflow on a Hamilton STAR liquid handler system. This was developed specifically for culturing hiPS cell lines expressing fluorescently tagged proteins, which we have used to study the principles by which cells establish and maintain robust dynamic localization of cellular structures. This protocol includes all details for the maintenance, passage and seeding of cells, as well as Matrigel coating of 6-well plastic plates and 96-well optical-grade, glass plates. We also developed an automated image-based hiPS cell colony segmentation and feature extraction pipeline to streamline the process of predicting cell count and selecting wells with consistent morphology for high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) microscopy. The imaging samples produced with this protocol have been used to study the integrated intracellular organization and cell-to-cell variability of hiPS cells to train and develop deep learning-based label-free predictions from transmitted-light microscopy images and to develop deep learning-based generative models of single-cell organization. This protocol requires some experience with robotic equipment. However, we provide details and source code to facilitate implementation by biologists less experienced with robotics. The protocol is completed in less than 10 h with minimal human interaction. Overall, automation of our cell culture procedures increased our imaging samples' standardization, reproducibility, scalability and consistency. It also reduced the need for stringent culturist training and eliminated culturist-to-culturist variability, both of which were previous pain points of our original manual pipeline workflow.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsAutomationCell Culture TechniquesHumansMicroscopyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38087082
OpenAlexW4389624544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.