ArticleInsights into imaging2023
Addressing challenges in radiomics research: systematic review and repository of open-access cancer imaging datasets.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Radiomics of the Paranasal Sinuses: A Systematic Review of Computer-Assisted Techniques to Assess Computed Tomography Radiological Data.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2025Pooled it
- Radiomic analysis of medical imaging for classification in oncology and recommendations for clinically initiated research: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- AI-powered radiogenomics: imaging-driven diagnosis and discovery of cancer's molecular and cellular landscape.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma survival prediction through MRI and clinical data integration with transfer learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Tumor stroma ratio-based radiomics model for predicting platinum resistance and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Assessing the multi-software robustness of radiomic biomarkers: a three-tool evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Application of multimodal fusion technology in early recurrence prediction and pathological analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Data Quality Assurance in Cancer Imaging Repositories.Cancers · 2025Article
- Foundation model embeddings for quantitative tumor imaging biomarkers.Research square · 2025Article
- Efficacy assessment in phase I clinical trials: endpoints and challenges.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025Review
- Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Review
- Addressing the current challenges in the clinical application of AI-based Radiomics for cancer imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Robust radiomics: a review of guidelines for radiomics in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- -New frontiers in domain-inspired radiomics and radiogenomics: increasing role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification and grading following WHO CNS-5 updates.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Different radiomics annotation methods comparison in rectal cancer characterisation and prognosis prediction: a two-centre study.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOpen-access cancer imaging datasets have become integral for evaluating novel AI approaches in radiology. However, their use in quantitative analysis with radiomics features presents unique challenges, such as incomplete documentation, low visibility, non-uniform data formats, data inhomogeneity, and complex preprocessing. These issues may cause problems with reproducibility and standardization in radiomics studies.
methodsWe systematically reviewed imaging datasets with public copyright licenses, published up to March 2023 across four large online cancer imaging archives. We included only datasets with tomographic images (CT, MRI, or PET), segmentations, and clinical annotations, specifically identifying those suitable for radiomics research. Reproducible preprocessing and feature extraction were performed for each dataset to enable their easy reuse.
resultsWe discovered 29 datasets with corresponding segmentations and labels in the form of health outcomes, tumor pathology, staging, imaging-based scores, genetic markers, or repeated imaging. We compiled a repository encompassing 10,354 patients and 49,515 scans. Of the 29 datasets, 15 were licensed under Creative Commons licenses, allowing both non-commercial and commercial usage and redistribution, while others featured custom or restricted licenses. Studies spanned from the early 1990s to 2021, with the majority concluding after 2013. Seven different formats were used for the imaging data. Preprocessing and feature extraction were successfully performed for each dataset.
conclusionRadiomicsHub is a comprehensive public repository with radiomics features derived from a systematic review of public cancer imaging datasets. By converting all datasets to a standardized format and ensuring reproducible and traceable processing, RadiomicsHub addresses key reproducibility and standardization challenges in radiomics. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically addresses the challenges associated with locating, preprocessing, and extracting quantitative features from open-access datasets, to facilitate more robust and reliable evaluations of radiomics models. KEY POINTS: - Through a systematic review, we identified 29 cancer imaging datasets suitable for radiomics research. - A public repository with collection overview and radiomics features, encompassing 10,354 patients and 49,515 scans, was compiled. - Most datasets can be shared, used, and built upon freely under a Creative Commons license. - All 29 identified datasets have been converted into a common format to enable reproducible radiomics feature extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.