Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38086919›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024

Feasibility of a novel wearable thermal device for management of bothersome hot flashes in patients with prostate cancer.

Pamela Peeke, Sonja K Billes, Andrew Vetter, Nader Naghavi, Diana Le, Matthew Smith, Alicia K Morgans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela PeekeEmbr Labs, Inc, Boston, MA, USA. pam@embrlabs.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8433-8812
Sonja K BillesEmbr Labs, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7042-9142
Andrew VetterEmbr Labs, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Nader NaghaviEmbr Labs, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-7213
Diana LeKelly Statistical Consulting, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Matthew SmithEmbr Labs, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Alicia K MorgansDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-4587
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USKelly Services (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis single-arm prospective study evaluated the feasibility of a novel wrist-worn thermal device that applies cooling to the inside of the wrist for management of bothersome hot flashes in prostate cancer survivors.

methods57 individuals were enrolled and instructed to use the thermal device as needed for management of hot flashes for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was thermal device usage (hours and sessions per day). Additional outcomes included the change in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS, range 0-10) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance 4a (PROMIS SD T-score, range 0-100) and Sleep-Related Impairment 8a (PROMIS SRI T-score, range 0-100). Study procedures were conducted remotely from May to Dec 2021 in the US.

results44 participants completed the study and 39 had retrievable usage data. The mean ± SD age was 67 ± 6 years and 5 ± 5 years since cancer diagnosis. The baseline mean ± SD HFRDIS score of 4.3 ± 2.0 indicated moderate hot flash interference in this population. During the study, participants used the thermal device (mean ± SD) 3.2 ± 2.5 hours/day and 7.6 ± 3.6 sessions/day. Most (67%) participants reported using the device 7 days and 7 nights each week. Statistically significant improvements from baseline at Week 4 were observed for HFRDIS (mean ± SE change: -1.1 ± 0.3), PROMIS SD (-6.0 ± 1.0), and PROMIS SRI (-5.5 ± 1.2) scores (all p < 0.001). The majority (69%) of participants reported that the thermal device was effective at helping them manage hot flashes. No adverse events were reported.

conclusionsResults support the feasibility of using the thermal device for management of bothersome hot flashes in prostate cancer survivors. Future randomized controlled studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of the thermal device on frequency and severity of hot flashes, sleep quality, fatigue, and overall quality of life.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesHot FlashesProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeWearable Electronic DevicesAgedCancer SurvivorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38086919
PMCPMC11543604
OpenAlexW4389683881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.