Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38086857›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Late gene therapy limits the restoration of retinal function in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Miranda L Scalabrino, Mishek Thapa, Tian Wang, Alapakkam P Sampath, Jeannie Chen, Greg D Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cell therapy for age-related macular degeneration.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel photoreceptor-specific promoters for gene therapy in mid- to late-stage retinal degeneration.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miranda L Scalabrino *Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-5170
Mishek Thapa *Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tian WangZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alapakkam P SampathStein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0785-9577
Jeannie ChenZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Greg D FieldStein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. gregfield@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-2679

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vadim Y Arshavsky · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
Vision Research Core at UCLAP30EY000331 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Gregory Darin Field, DAVID S WILLIAMS · 1985 to 2026
$16.8M
Phototransduction in health and diseaseR01EY012155 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jeannie Chen · 1998 to 2026
$11.8M
Analyses of retinal circuits after rod rescue in a mouse model of human blindnessR01EY027193 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, JEANNIE, FIELD, GREGORY DARIN · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY000331NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012155NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited photoreceptor degeneration that begins with rod loss followed by cone loss. This cell loss greatly diminishes vision, with most patients becoming legally blind. Gene therapies are being developed, but it is unknown how retinal function depends on the time of intervention. To uncover this dependence, we utilize a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa capable of artificial genetic rescue. This model enables a benchmark of best-case gene therapy by removing variables that complicate answering this question. Complete genetic rescue was performed at 25%, 50%, and 70% rod loss (early, mid and late, respectively). Early and mid treatment restore retinal output to near wild-type levels. Late treatment retinas exhibit continued, albeit slowed, loss of sensitivity and signal fidelity among retinal ganglion cells, as well as persistent gliosis. We conclude that gene replacement therapies delivered after 50% rod loss are unlikely to restore visual function to normal. This is critical information for administering gene therapies to rescue vision.

Indexed as

Retinal DegenerationRetinitis PigmentosaAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyHumansMiceRetinaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID38086857
PMCPMC10716155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.