Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38086593›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Understanding and addressing changing administrative workload in primary care in Canada: protocol for a mixed-method study.

M Ruth Lavergne, Catherine Moravac, Fiona Bergin, Richard Buote, Julie Easley, Agnes Grudniewicz, Lindsay Hedden, Myles Leslie, Madeleine McKay, Emily Gard Marshall and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Administrative burden in primary care: Critical review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M Ruth LavergneDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ruth.lavergne@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4205-4600
Catherine MoravacDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Fiona BerginPractice Ready Assessment Program, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Richard BuoteCollege of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Julie EasleyFamily Medicine, Horizon Health Network, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Myles LeslieUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Madeleine McKayDoctors Nova Scotia, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0329
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4554-7635
Melanie MooneyPrimary Health Care and Chronic Disease Management, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Yarmoth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Erin PalmerDalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Joshua TraceyDalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany Canadians struggle to access the primary care they need while at the same time primary care providers report record levels of stress and overwork. There is an urgent need to understand factors contributing to the gap between a growing per-capita supply of primary care providers and declines in the availability of primary care services. The assumption of responsibility by primary care teams for services previously delivered on an in-patient basis, along with a rise in administrative responsibilities may be factors influencing reduced access to care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this mixed-methods study, our first objective is to determine how the volume of services requiring primary care coordination has changed over time in the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. We will collect quantitative administrative data to investigate how services have shifted in ways that may impact administrative workload in primary care. Our second objective is to use qualitative interviews with family physicians, nurse practitioners and administrative team members providing primary care to understand how administrative workload has changed over time. We will then identify priority issues and practical response strategies using two deliberative dialogue events convened with primary care providers, clinical and system leaders, and policy-makers.We will analyse changes in service use data between 2001/2002 and 2021/2022 using annual total counts, rates per capita, rates per primary care provider and per primary care service. We will conduct reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes and to compare and contrast participant responses reflecting differences across disciplines, payment and practice models, and practice settings. Areas of concern and potential solutions raised during interviews will inform deliberative dialogue events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We received research ethics approval from Nova Scotia Health (#1028815). Knowledge translation will occur through dialogue events, academic papers and presentations at national and international conferences.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareWorkloadCanadaHumansNova Scotiahealth services administration & managementhuman resource managementorganisation of health servicesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38086593
PMCPMC10729089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.