Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38086126›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2023

Effect of ultrasonic treatment on enzymes: Decoupling the relation between the ultrasonic driven conformational change and enzyme activity.

Bashar Kabawa, Imca Sampers, Katleen Raes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bashar KabawaResearch Unit VEG-i-TEC, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Campus Kortrijk, Sint-Martens-Latemlaan 2B, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Bashar.kabawa@UGent.be.
Imca SampersResearch Unit VEG-i-TEC, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Campus Kortrijk, Sint-Martens-Latemlaan 2B, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Imca.sampers@UGent.be.
Katleen RaesResearch Unit VEG-i-TEC, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Campus Kortrijk, Sint-Martens-Latemlaan 2B, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Katleen.raes@UGent.be.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the growing interest in enzyme-based extraction technology as a safe and eco-friendly extraction technique, along with the relatively high cost associated with enzymatic applications, it became necessary to explore novel strategies aimed to improve enzyme activity. In this study, the impact of ultrasonic treatment on commercial cellulase and pectinase was investigated. As this effect may be influenced by various ultrasonic and enzyme-related parameters, changes in enzyme conformation were explored under optimal and non-optimal enzyme conditions. The intrinsic fluorescence spectrum was utilized as a tool for monitoring these changes. Additionally, the enzyme's catalytic potential was also assessed under the same conditions. Results indicated that the impact of ultrasonic treatment on enzyme conformation primarily depends on the total ultrasonic energy delivered to the system, rather than other ultrasonic parameters such as power, sample volume, treatment time, or duty cycle. The maximum relative decrease in intrinsic fluorescence intensity of Pectinex® Ultra Clear (PUC) and Pectinex® Ultra SPL (PUS) after ultrasonic treatment was approximately 51% and 55%, respectively, while the decrease induced by thermal denaturation was 25% and 30% respectively. Furthermore, a blue shift in the fluorescence spectrum of both pectinases was observed upon sonication for all process conditions indicating a change in enzyme conformation. However, ultrasonic treatment did not result in a significant change in enzyme activity, suggesting that these conformational adjustments may occur in regions other than the active sites. Moreover, ultrasonicated pectinases and cellulases did not exhibit any improvement in their catalytic potential under either optimal or non-optimal conditions.

Indexed as

CellulaseUltrasonicsPolygalacturonaseCellulasePolygalacturonaseCellulaseEnergyEnzyme activityEnzyme conformationPectinaseUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38086126
PMCPMC10733687
OpenAlexW4389505229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.