Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38085710›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.

Kaisa Fritzell, Berith Hedberg, Anke Woudstra, Anna Forsberg, Marika Sventelius, Anders Kottorp, Anna Jervaeus

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05512260 (Towards High, Equal and Informed Participation in Swedish Cancer Screening - the BESTa Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512260 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Towards High, Equal and Informed Participation in Swedish Cancer Screening - the BESTa Project.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2023 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsNeoplasm, Colorectal, Neoplasm, Breast, Neoplasm, OvarianArmsIndividual decision aid (iDA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaisa FritzellDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Berith HedbergSchool of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Anke WoudstraTeam Advies en Onderzoek, Municipal Health Service (GGD) Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Anna ForsbergDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marika SventeliusRegional Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Gotland, Sweden.
Anders KottorpFaculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Anna JervaeusDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-8142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSweden has a long tradition of organized national population-based screening programmes. Participation rates differ between programmes and regions, being relatively high in some groups, but lower in others. To ensure an equity perspective on screening, it is desirable that individuals make an informed decision based on knowledge rather than ignorance, misconceptions, or fear. Decision Aids (DAs) are set to deliver information about different healthcare options and help individuals to visualize the values associated with each available option. DAs are not intended to guide individuals to choose one option over another. The advantage of an individual Decision Aid (iDA) is that individuals gain knowledge about cancer and screening by accessing one webpage with the possibility to communicate with health professionals and thereafter make their decision regarding participation. The objective is therefore to develop, implement and evaluate a digital iDA for individuals invited to cancer screening in Sweden.

methodsThis study encompasses a process-, implementation-, and outcome evaluation. Multiple methods will be applied including focus group discussions, individual interviews and the usage of the think aloud technique and self-reported questionnaire data. The project is based on The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) framework and the proposed model development process for DAs. Individuals aged 23-74, including women (the cervical-, breast- and CRC screening module) and men (the CRC screening module), will be included in the developmental process. Efforts will be made to recruit participants with self-reported physical and mental limitations, individuals without a permanent residence and ethnic minorities. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first attempt aimed at developing an iDA for use in the Swedish context. The iDA is intended to facilitate shared decision making about participation in screening. Furthermore, the iDA is expected to increase knowledge and raise awareness about cancer and cancer screening. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Lay people are involved throughout the whole development and implementation process of the digital DA.

trial registrationNCT05512260.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesNeoplasmsDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMalePatient ParticipationSweden

Identifiers

PMID38085710
PMCPMC10715660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.