ArticleJAMA network open2023
Opportunistic Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Lung Cancer Mortality in China.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A high-resolution circulating metabolic atlas of lung adenocarcinoma progression supports early and accurate diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Optical Navigation Robot-Assisted versus Conventional CT-Guided Localization of Pulmonary Nodules: A Comparison of Efficacy and Analysis of Complication Predictors.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Optical Navigation Robot-Assisted versus Conventional CT-Guided Localization of Pulmonary Nodules: A Comparison of Efficacy and Analysis of Complication Predictors.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- LDCT screening for lung cancer in East Asian never-smokers: balancing benefits and overdiagnosis-related harms.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors of lung nodules in a non-smoking Chinese population: a prospective study of low-dose computed tomography screening.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the lung cancer screening eligibility gap: evaluation of guideline applicability in asymptomatic patients.Military Medical Research · 2026Observational
- Multi-center benchmarking of large language models for clinical decision support in lung cancer screening.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- An intelligent diagnostic model for pulmonary nodules utilizing chest radiographic imagery and its application in community-based lung cancer screening.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- NotifAI-OS: an AI framework for automated CT-based opportunistic screening in post-acute value-based care.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- External Testing of a Deep Learning Model for Lung Cancer Risk from Low-Dose Chest CT.Radiology · 2025Article
- Proteomic profiles screening identified novel exosomal protein biomarkers for diagnosis of lung cancer.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Notice of Retraction and Replacement. Wang L, et al. Opportunistic Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Lung Cancer Mortality in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2347176.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Lung cancer screening eligibility and recruitment during routine care by pulmonologists: barriers and new opportunities in the Brazilian public healthcare system.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024Article
- Estimating the Effects of Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice Settings: The Role of Selective Uptake and Suboptimal Adherence along the Cancer Screening Continuum.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Noteworthy impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening: A systematic review.Fundamental research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Reinstatement · 2024-09-30Bias Issues or Lack of Balance · Concerns/Issues about Data · Investigation by Third Party · Retract and Replace ·
- Commented on byBeyond the2024
- Retracted
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Despite the recommendations of lung cancer screening guidelines and the evidence supporting the effectiveness of population-based lung screening, a common barrier to effective lung cancer screening is that the participation rates of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening among individuals with the highest risk are not large. There are limited data from clinical practice regarding whether opportunistic LDCT screening is associated with reduced lung-cancer mortality. Objective: To evaluate whether opportunistic LDCT screening is associated with improved prognosis among adults with lung cancer in mainland China. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with lung cancer at Weihai Municipal Hospital Healthcare Group, Weihai City, China, from 2016 to 2021. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Data collected included demographic indicators, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, blood indexes, and treatment information. Patients were classified into screened and nonscreened groups on the basis of whether or not their lung cancer diagnosis occurred through opportunistic screening. Main Outcomes and Measures: Follow-up outcome indicators included lung cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to account for potential imbalanced factors between groups. The associations between LDCT screening and outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression models based on the matched data. Propensity score regression adjustment and inverse probability treatment weighting were used for sensitivity analysis. Results: A total of 5234 patients (mean [SD] baseline age, 61.8 [9.8] years; 2518 [48.1%] female) with complete opportunistic screening information were included in the analytical sample, with 2251 patients (42.91%) receiving their lung cancer diagnosis through opportunistic screening. After 1:1 PSM, 2788 patients (1394 in each group) were finally included. The baseline characteristics of the matched patients were balanced between groups. Opportunistic screening with LDCT was associated with a 49% lower risk of lung cancer death (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.62) and 46% lower risk of all-cause death (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.45-0.64). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with lung cancer, opportunistic lung cancer screening with LDCT was associated with lower lung cancer mortality and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest that opportunistic screening is an important supplement to population screening to improve prognosis of adults with lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.