ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2024
Cardiac telerehabilitation: current status and future perspectives.
Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07363447 (The Role of Supervision), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Supervision: Effects of Different Telerehabilitation Methods In Patients With Hypertension
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of mHealth-supported and centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with stable coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Trial
- Effects on atrial fibrillation symptom burden of an obesity-focused cardiac rehabilitation program: Insights from the OPTICARE XL trial.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Coronary artery bypass grafting patients' preferences and willingness to pay for remote cardiac rehabilitation: discrete choice experiment study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Toward Intelligent Rehabilitation Program Management: A System-Level Review of AI Architectures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patient characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non-participation in cardiac (tele)rehabilitation-a prospective analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Comparative Systematic Review of Home-Based and Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation of Delivery Models and Outcomes.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Comparing disparities in geographic proximity to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation before and after decentralisation of services: a repeated cross-sectional study using individual-level register data.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Trends and effectiveness of digital health management in postdischarge coronary artery disease across COVID19 pandemic.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Center-Based and Tele-Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease: Effects on Functional Capacity, QoL, and Kinesiophobia.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of digital healthcare to improve clinical outcomes in discharged patients with coronary artery disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy and Impact of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction-the remote exercise SWEDEHEART study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Efficacy of an Internet of Things-based system for cardiac rehabilitation monitoring: insights from the IntellIoT pivotal trial in heart failure patients.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Future Patient-Telerehabilitation of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Protocol for a Multicenter, Mixed Methods, Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Different Models of Cardiac Telerehabilitation for People with Coronary Artery Disease: Features and Effectiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- 'An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure'.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Article
- Cardiac (tele)rehabilitation in routine clinical practice for patients with coronary artery disease: protocol of the REHAB + trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Participation Among Rural Residents With Cardiovascular Disease in Brazil.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the prognosis and quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease and has therefore received strong recommendations in international guidelines for the treatment of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and chronic heart failure. Aiming to both resolve several barriers that impede participation in CR and to improve the effectiveness of CR, cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has emerged as a cost-effective alternative to traditional, centre-based CR. Although the body of evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of CTR is large and still growing, real-life implementations are scarce, which may be due to insufficient knowledge about CTR interventions and due to the challenges its implementation comes with. Up to now, mainly exercise-related core components of CR and e‑coaching have been investigated in the setting of CTR. Translation of research findings to clinical practice may be hampered by methodological limitations present in most CTR studies, being selection bias of participants, lack of long-term follow-up, heterogeneity of studied interventions and the lack of robust outcome measures. Besides conducting highly needed implementation studies for CTR interventions, their implementation could be facilitated by the development of guideline-based, multidisciplinary and personalised CTR programmes and widespread reimbursement for CTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.