Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38085432›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2024

Projected costs of informal care for older people in England.

Bo Hu, Javiera Cartagena-Farias, Nicola Brimblecombe, Shari Jadoolal, Raphael Wittenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo HuCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. b.hu@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-505X
Javiera Cartagena-FariasCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Nicola BrimblecombeCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Shari JadoolalCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Raphael WittenbergCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
London School of Economics and Political Science · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth economics research and economic evaluation have increasingly taken a societal perspective, accounting for the economic impacts of informal care. Projected economic costs of informal care help researchers and policymakers understand better the long-term consequences of policy reforms and health interventions. This study makes projections of the economic costs of informal care for older people in England.

methodsData come from two national surveys: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA, N = 35,425) and the Health Survey for England (N = 17,292). We combine a Markov model with a macrosimulation model to make the projections. We explore a range of assumptions about future demographic and epidemiological trends to capture model uncertainty and take a Bayesian approach to capture parameter uncertainty.

resultsWe estimate that the economic costs of informal care were £54.2 billion in 2019, three times larger than the expenditure on formal long-term care. Those costs are projected to rise by 87% by 2039, faster than public expenditure but slower than private expenditure on formal long-term care. These results are sensitive to assumptions about future life expectancy, fertility rates, and progression of disabilities in the population.

conclusionsPrevention schemes aiming to promote healthy aging and independence will be important to alleviate the costs of informal care. The government should strengthen support for informal caregivers and care recipients to ensure the adequacy of care, protect the well-being of caregivers, and prevent the costs of informal care from spilling over to other sectors of the economy.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremMarkov ChainsAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversEnglandFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansLife ExpectancyLongitudinal StudiesLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedPatient CareEconomic valuationEnglandFunctional disabilitiesInformal care costsLong-term care projections

Identifiers

PMID38085432
PMCPMC11283415
OpenAlexW4389620473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.