SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023
Fluorescence-guided resection of intradural spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Indocyanine Green Videoangiography in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Focus on Lesion Localization Accuracy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Image-Guided Brain Tumor Surgery.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intradural spinal tumors present significant challenges due to involvement of critical motor and sensory tracts. Achieving maximal resection while preserving functional tissue is therefore crucial. Fluorescence-guided surgery aims to improve resection accuracy and is well studied for brain tumors, but its efficacy has not been fully assessed for spinal tumors. This meta-analysis aims to delineate the efficacy of fluorescence guidance in intradural spinal tumor resection. The authors performed a systematic review in four databases. We included studies that have utilized fluorescence agents, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or sodium fluorescein, for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 12 studies involving 552 patients undergoing fluorescence-guided intradural spinal tumor resection were included. Meningiomas demonstrated a 98% fluorescence rate and were associated with a homogenous florescence pattern; however, astrocytomas had variable fluorescence rate with pooled proportion of 70%. There was no significant difference in gross total resection (GTR) rates between fluorescein and 5-ALA (94% vs 84%, p = .22). Pre-operative contrast enhancement was significantly associated with intraoperative fluorescence with fluorescein. Intramedullary tumors with positive intraoperative fluorescence were significantly associated with higher GTR rates (96% vs 73%, p = .03). Utilizing fluorescence guidance during intradural spinal tumor resection holds promise of improving intraoperative visualization for specific intradural spinal tumors. Meningiomas and ependymomas have the highest fluorescence rates especially with sodium fluorescein; on the other hand, astrocytomas have variable fluorescence rates with no superiority of either agent. Positive fluorescence of intramedullary tumors is associated with a higher degree of resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.