Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38085357›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024

[Determinants of the utilization of cancer screening among older adults in Saxony-Anhalt-What is the influence of health literacy?]

Lena Kannengießer, Ruben Ulbrich, Claudia Hasenpusch, Ilona Hrudey, Svenja Walter, Christoph Stallmann, Enno Swart, Stefanie March

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lena KannengießerInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. Lena.kannengiesser@med.ovgu.de.
Ruben UlbrichInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Claudia HasenpuschInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Ilona HrudeyInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Svenja WalterInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Christoph StallmannInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Enno SwartInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Stefanie MarchFachbereich Soziale Arbeit, Gesundheit und Medien, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Magdeburg (Sachsen-Anhalt), Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to preserve health and thus social participation, it is important for older people to make health-related decisions, such as those regarding the use of a secondary prevention service like cancer screening. National and international studies show that various predictors determine cancer screening participation. The aim of this study is to determine the cancer screening utilization of older people in a structurally weak region.

methodsIn 2021, a cross-sectional study in each of two urban and rural communities in Saxony-Anhalt surveyed individuals aged 55 years and older about determinants, reasons, and barriers to preventive service use (n = 954). Binary logistic regression analysis is used to analyze determinants of cancer screening use.

resultsThree quarters of the study population (76.6%) self-reported participating in a cancer screening service at least once. The multivariable analyses demonstrate factors that influence the utilization of cancer screening. Age, partial knowledge on cancer screening, cancer screening as a benefit offered by a statutory health insurances' bonus program, experience with cancer in the immediate environment, thoughts about one's own health, and the feeling of security that participation gives are factors that significantly influence the use of cancer screening. Descriptively, the physician's recommendation is the strongest factor for participation.

conclusionThe analyses show that cancer screenings are generally well received by older people in Saxony-Anhalt, but participation in them is not related to health literacy. In keeping with the National Cancer Plan, older people should generally be supported in making an informed decision, for example, through target-group-specific physician education.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyNeoplasmsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerGermanyHumansCancer screeningCross-sectional studyOlder adultsPreventionSaxony-Anhalt

Identifiers

PMID38085357
PMCPMC10776466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.