Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38085302›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Cochlear implantation compliance among minorities at high risk for hearing impairment following universal newborn hearing screening.

Oren Ziv, Mattan Danovitch, Daniel M Kaplan, Muhammad Abu Tailakh, Revital Gorali, Lea Kurtzman, Sofia Kordeluk, Sabri El-Saied, Yuval Slovik, Oded Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oren ZivDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel. orenziv11@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-9248
Mattan DanovitchDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Daniel M KaplanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Muhammad Abu TailakhFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Revital GoraliSpeech and Hearing Institute, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Lea KurtzmanSpeech and Hearing Institute, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Sofia KordelukDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Sabri El-SaiedDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Yuval SlovikDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Oded CohenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, POB 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILSoroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) allows for early detection of hearing impairment (HI). The goal of this current study was to evaluate the impact of cultural background involving consanguineous marriage on newborn HI diagnosed using UNHS, and compliance with hearing rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that included all children born at a single tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2017 who did not pass the UNHS (oto-acoustic emission and auditory brainstem response), and were diagnosed with HI. The study group included children from consanguineous marriage cultural background which were compared to a control group-all other children. Data were retrieved from the computerized medical charts and included epidemiological, audiological, and pregnancy/delivery-related data, and known risk factors for congenital HI.

resultsA total of 238 (196 study and 42 control) neonates were diagnosed with HI. Family history of HI was significantly more prevalent in the study group in mild-severe and profound HI subgroups (p = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). Study group demonstrated lower rates of cochlear implantation (CI) compliance (p = 0.079), performed at a significantly older age (23 months (IQR 17-36.5) vs. 16 (IQR 12-26) months, p = 0.021). When recommended, bilateral CI compliance was significantly lower in the study group (94.1 vs.48.9%, p < 0.001).

conclusionUNHS allows for early HI detection among minority populations at higher risk for CI, yet compliance rates remain lower compared with control. Familiarity of families with the importance of early detection and HI risk may result in higher compliance rates for cochlear implantation. Health providers should aim to improve education and communication with this unique group of patients and consider health promotion programs.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing LossNeonatal ScreeningPatient ComplianceConsanguinityFemaleHearing TestsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMinority GroupsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCochlear implantationCongenital, hearing impairmentNewborn, deafnessRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38085302
OpenAlexW4389620538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.