ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
["Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex"].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of the new S3 guideline "Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex" was funded by the German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Despite the relatively low level of evidence of the identified literature, a systematic approach and consistent evaluation of the literature enabled the formulation of a large number of evidence-based recommendations across a variety of topics. In addition, a patient guideline is under development in order to disseminate the guideline recommendations and to enhance self-management and understanding among patients and their relatives. A needs analysis had been carried out in order to adequately assess the topics that are most important for patients and relatives. Upon completion of the German guideline, an English translation in cooperation with the e‑UROGEN network is planned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38085295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.