Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38085288›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2023

Improving hybrid rice breeding programs via stochastic simulations: number of parents, number of hybrids, tester update, and genomic prediction of hybrid performance.

Roberto Fritsche-Neto, Jauhar Ali, Erik Jon De Asis, Mehrzad Allahgholipour, Marlee Rose Labroo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberto Fritsche-NetoInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines. rfneto@agcenter.lsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4310-0047
Jauhar AliInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines. J.Ali@irri.org.
Erik Jon De AsisInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines.
Mehrzad AllahgholipourInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines.
Marlee Rose LabrooExcellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, Lisbon, Mexico.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1194889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageSchemes that use genomic prediction outperform others, updating testers increases hybrid genetic gain, and larger population sizes tend to have higher genetic gain and less depletion of genetic variance One of the most common methods to improve hybrid performance is reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS). Genomic prediction (GP) can be used to increase genetic gain in RRS by reducing cycle length, but it is also possible to use GP to predict single-cross hybrid performance. The impact of the latter method on genetic gain has yet to be previously reported. Therefore, we compared via stochastic simulations various phenotypic and genomics-assisted RRS breeding schemes which used GP to predict hybrid performance rather than reducing cycle length, which allows minimal changes to traditional breeding schemes. We also compared three breeding sizes scenarios that varied the number of genotypes crossed within heterotic pools, the number of genotypes crossed between heterotic pools, the number of hybrids evaluated, and the number of genomic predicted hybrids. Our results demonstrated that schemes that used genomic prediction of hybrid performance outperformed the others for the average interpopulation hybrid population and the best hybrid performance. Furthermore, updating the testers increased hybrid genetic gain with phenotypic RRS. As expected, the largest breeding size tested had the highest rates of genetic improvement and the lowest decrease in additive genetic variance due to the drift. Therefore, this study demonstrates the usefulness of single-cross prediction, which may be easier to implement than rapid-cycling RRS and cyclical updating of testers. We also reiterate that larger population sizes tend to have higher genetic gain and less depletion of genetic variance.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticOryzaGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticParentsPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID38085288
PMCPMC10716074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.