ArticleClinical cardiology2024
A nationwide trend analysis on the usage of endomyocardial biopsy.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endomyocardial Biopsy Revisited: Diagnostic Value and Expanding Roles in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Present and future of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac amyloidosis.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- A comparative review of myocarditis in pediatrics versus adults: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A nationwide trend analysis on the usage of endomyocardial biopsy.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a safe procedure performed in diagnostic work-up of cardiac disease. HYPOTHESIS: Data regarding temporal trends of total numbers, characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and complications of patients undergoing EMB are sparse.
methodsThe nationwide German inpatient sample (2005-2019) was used for this analysis. Patient cases of EBM during the 5-year cycles from 2005 to 2009, 2010 to 2014, and 2015 to 2019 were compared, and temporal trends regarding total numbers and presumable major and minor EMB-associated complications were investigated.
resultsOverall, 67 745 EMB were performed in Germany 2005-2019. Total number of EMB increased from 3083 in 2005 to 5646 in 2019 (β 0.40 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.43], p < .001). Among these EMB, 19 083 (28.2%) were performed during the period 2005-2009, 22 867 (33.7%) 2010-2014, and 25 795 (38.1%) between 2015 and 2019. The proportion of patients aged ≥70 years was highest 2015-2019 (2005-2009: 9.3%; 2010-2014: 13.8%; 2015-2019: 16.1%, p < .001) and the most aggravated comorbidity profile (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.25 ± 1.93; 2.67 ± 2.14; 3.01 ± 2.29, p < .001) was also detected 2015-2019. Major complications occurred less often in the period 2015-2019 compared to 2005-2009 (odds ratio [OR] 0.921 [95% CI 0.893-0.950], p < .001), whereas minor complications were more frequently observed between 2015 and 2019 (OR 1.067 [95% CI 1.042-1.093], p < .001). While a decrease in major complications was detected irrespective of age, an increase in minor complications was identified only in patients between 30-59 years.
conclusionsAnnual numbers of EMB increased significantly in Germany 2005-2019. Patients who underwent EMB in recent years were older and showed an aggravated comorbidity profile accompanied by fewer major complications, underscoring safety of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.