Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084937›Full record

SynthesisParasite (Paris, France)2023

Systematic review of hematophagous arthropods present in cattle in France.

Jorian Prudhomme, Jérôme Depaquit, Johanna Fite, Elsa Quillery, Emilie Bouhsira, Emmanuel Liénard

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasite (Paris, France), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Circulation aspects of phlebotomines (Diptera:Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorian PrudhommeInTheres, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3672-2692
Jérôme DepaquitUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculté de Pharmacie, EA7510 EpidémioSurveillance et Circulation de Parasites dans les Environnements, and ANSES, USC Pathogènes-Environnement-Toxoplasme-Arthropodes-Réservoirs-bioDiversité, Reims, France - Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, 51092 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-0088
Johanna FiteFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Risk Assessment Department, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-7328
Elsa QuilleryFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Risk Assessment Department, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-6136
Emilie BouhsiraInTheres, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-3458
Emmanuel LiénardInTheres, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-0460

Funding

ANSES 2021-CRD-01Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of pathogens, whether zoonotic or not, can have a lasting effect on commercial livestock farms, with dramatic health, social and economic consequences. However, available data concerning the arthropod vectors present and circulating on livestock farms in France are still very imprecise, fragmentary, and scattered. In this context, we conducted a systematic review of the hematophagous arthropod species recorded on different types of cattle farms in mainland France (including Corsica). The used vector "groups" studied were biting flies, biting midges, black flies, fleas, horse flies, lice, louse flies, mosquitoes, sand flies, and ticks. A large number of documents were selected (N = 9,225), read (N = 1,047) and analyzed (N = 290), allowing us to provide distribution and abundance maps of different species of medical and veterinary interest according to literature data. Despite the large number of documents collected and analyzed, there are few data provided on cattle farm characteristics. Moreover, data on all arthropod groups lack numerical detail and are based on limited data in time and/or space. Therefore, they are not generalizable nor comparable. There is still little information on many vectors (and their pathogens) and still many unknowns for most studied groups. It appears necessary to provide new, updated and standardized data, collected in different geographical and climatological areas. Finally, this work highlights the lack of entomologists, funding, training and government support, leading to an increased risk of uncontrolled disease emergence in cattle herds.

Indexed as

CeratopogonidaeCulicidaeTicksAnimalsArthropod VectorsCattleLivestockMosquito VectorsArthropodsCattleHematophagousPRISMASystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38084937
PMCPMC10714678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.