ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
scATAC-seq preprocessing and imputation evaluation system for visualization, clustering and digital footprinting.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational framework to dissect imputation strategies for single-cell histone modification data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Decoding cell fate: integrated experimental and computational analysis at the single-cell level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- IMATAC imputes single-cell ATAC-seq data by deep hierarchical network with denoising autoencoder.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- GPU-accelerated Kendall distance computation for large or sparse data.GigaScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) is a recently developed approach that provides means to investigate open chromatin at single cell level, to assess epigenetic regulation and transcription factors binding landscapes. The sparsity of the scATAC-seq data calls for imputation. Similarly, preprocessing (filtering) may be required to reduce computational load due to the large number of open regions. However, optimal strategies for both imputation and preprocessing have not been yet evaluated together. We present SAPIEnS (scATAC-seq Preprocessing and Imputation Evaluation System), a benchmark for scATAC-seq imputation frameworks, a combination of state-of-the-art imputation methods with commonly used preprocessing techniques. We assess different types of scATAC-seq analysis, i.e. clustering, visualization and digital genomic footprinting, and attain optimal preprocessing-imputation strategies. We discuss the benefits of the imputation framework depending on the task and the number of the dataset features (peaks). We conclude that the preprocessing with the Boruta method is beneficial for the majority of tasks, while imputation is helpful mostly for small datasets. We also implement a SAPIEnS database with pre-computed transcription factor footprints based on imputed data with their activity scores in a specific cell type. SAPIEnS is published at: https://github.com/lab-medvedeva/SAPIEnS. SAPIEnS database is available at: https://sapiensdb.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.