Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084426›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023

Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Irfan Ahmed, Jemma Hudson, Karen Innes, Rodolfo Hernández, Katie Gillies, Rebecca Bruce, Victoria Bell, Alison Avenell, Jane Blazeby, Miriam Brazzelli and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Follow-up study of gallbladder stones in 44 children.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irfan AhmedDepartment of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK i.ahmed@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-4177
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-6419
Karen InnesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8512-4368
Rodolfo HernándezHealth Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2619-8230
Katie GilliesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7890-2854
Rebecca BruceHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-1206
Victoria BellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9518-9296
Alison AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4813-5628
Jane BlazebyCentre for Surgical Research, NIHR Bristol and Western Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-3330
Miriam BrazzelliHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7576-6751
Seonaidh CottonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-0608
Bernard CroalClinical Biochemistry, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-3507
Mark ForrestHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2395-8823
Graeme MacLennanThe Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials,Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-5646
Peter MurchieAcademic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-5991
Samantha WilemanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1031-1449
Craig RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-7349
C-GALL Study Group
University of Aberdeen · GBNHS Grampian · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of conservative management compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the prevention of symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease.

designParallel group, pragmatic randomised, superiority trial.

setting20 secondary care centres in the UK.

participants434 adults (>18 years) with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease referred to secondary care, assessed for eligibility between August 2016 and November 2019, and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive conservative management or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

interventionsConservative management or surgical removal of the gallbladder.

main outcome measuresThe primary patient outcome was quality of life, measured by area under the curve, over 18 months using the short form 36 (SF-36) bodily pain domain, with higher scores (range 0-100) indicating better quality of life. Other outcomes included costs to the NHS, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratio.

resultsOf 2667 patients assessed for eligibility, 434 were randomised: 217 to the conservative management group and 217 to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. By 18 months, 54 (25%) participants in the conservative management arm and 146 (67%) in the cholecystectomy arm had received surgery. The mean SF-36 norm based bodily pain score was 49.4 (standard deviation 11.7) in the conservative management arm and 50.4 (11.6) in the cholecystectomy arm. The SF-36 bodily pain area under the curve up to 18 months did not differ (mean difference 0.0, 95% confidence interval -1.7 to 1.7; P=1.00). Conservative management was less costly (mean difference -£1033, (-$1334; -€1205), 95% credible interval -£1413 to -£632) and QALYs did not differ (mean difference -0.019, 95% credible interval -0.06 to 0.02).

conclusionsIn the short term (≤18 months), laparoscopic surgery is no more effective than conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease, and as such conservative management should be considered as an alternative to surgery. From an NHS perspective, conservative management may be cost effective for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. As costs, complications, and benefits will continue to be incurred in both groups beyond 18 months, future research should focus on longer term follow-up to establish effectiveness and lifetime cost effectiveness and to identify the cohort of patients who should be routinely offered surgery.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN55215960.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholelithiasisAdultConservative TreatmentCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPainQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38084426
PMCPMC10698555
OpenAlexW4389378685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.