Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084369›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology report2022

One wave or another in the pandemic: psychological well-being during the third COVID-19 wave.

Michela Marchetti, Daniele Gatti, Lucio Inguscio, Giuliana Mazzoni

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology report, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela MarchettiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-1053
Daniele GattiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-2752
Lucio InguscioDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-7767
Giuliana MazzoniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-0139
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a year from the emergence of COVID-19 in February 2020, between March and May 2021 Italy faced its third wave of infections. Previous studies have shown that in the first phases of the pandemic certain factors had a protective effect against distress. However, little is known regarding the role of possible protective variables after prolonged pandemic situations. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: 454 Italian adults were asked questions regarding the intensity of mental states and emotions experienced, the perceived usefulness of lockdown, the feeling of living a normal life, and the coping strategies implemented to face the pandemic.

resultsOur findings indicate that the presence of acceptance attitudes toward restrictive measures and the implementation of recreational activities helped participants face a prolonged pandemic with positive emotions.

conclusionsThese results extend previous findings about the impact of several behavioral variables on individuals' mental states and emotions experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

Indexed as

COVID-19emotionslockdownpsychological well-being

Identifiers

PMID38084369
PMCPMC10681829
OpenAlexW4225365153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.