Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084340›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Reflections on Drivers for the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria Detected from Chickens reared on Commercial Layer Farms in Mukono District, Uganda.

Steven Kakooza, Dickson Stuart Tayebwa, Kassim Rashid Njalira, Edrine Beatrice Kayaga, Ismail Asiimwe, Mariam Komugisha, Mariam Wanyana, Raymond Kisekka, Alex Kyabarongo, David H Kiryabwire and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven KakoozaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-8956
Dickson Stuart TayebwaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kassim Rashid NjaliraCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Edrine Beatrice KayagaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ismail AsiimweBukomansimbi District Veterinary Office, Bukomansimbi, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0003-2805-5206
Mariam KomugishaMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda.
Mariam WanyanaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Raymond KisekkaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex KyabarongoCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-4647
David H KiryabwireMukono District Veterinary Office, Mukono, Uganda.
Esther NabattaMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda.
Wilfred EnekuCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries · UGNaggalama Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the fecal carriage of antimicrobial resistant Methods: Twenty-nine commercial layer farms were visited and samples collected from 10 birds. The samples were then subjected to culture and sensitivity testing. The investigative framework for antimicrobial stewardship practices (IFAP) was used as a participatory tool to generate data through interviews and observations on antimicrobial use, drivers for use, players, and actions following non-responsive treatment outcomes. Results: The cultures done on 290 cloacal swabs yielded a total of 273 Conclusion: The IFAP tool was useful and can be modified, and adopted for use in engaging agricultural communities in participatory AMR surveillance. A high carriage of multi-drug resistant

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipEscherichia coli of chickenUganda’s poultry sector

Identifiers

PMID38084340
PMCPMC10710787
OpenAlexW4389356415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.