Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084304›Full record

ReviewHealth psychology report2021

A review of stress management interventions for the oncology nursing workforce: What do we know and what should we be doing differently?

William Kent, Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams, Kevin D Hochard

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health psychology report, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William KentCentre for Contextual Behavioural Science, University of Chester, Chester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-8018
Nicholas J Hulbert-WilliamsCentre for Contextual Behavioural Science, University of Chester, Chester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-5485
Kevin D HochardCentre for Contextual Behavioural Science, University of Chester, Chester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-4683
University of Chester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology nurses are at risk of chronic stress. In this narrative review we provide an overview of stress management intervention studies for oncology nurses, and suggest that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/Training (ACT) provides a better intervention framework due to the relevance of underpinning therapeutic processes (e.g. acceptance, mindfulness, values clarification) to the role and stress-related experiences of this workforce population. Current evidence for the effectiveness of stress management intervention varies, with few studies describing how theory informs intervention content, or justifying why they should benefit this population specifically. ACT lends itself to data-driven intervention development, thus potentially addressing some methodological limitations in this field. Only one trial has tested ACT in this population, reporting only partial effects. Further empirical research is required given (a) the applicability of ACT for this population and context, and (b) the associated advantages of brief and/or group delivery to address known barriers to participating in stress management interventions.

Indexed as

ACTinterventiononcology nursesstress management

Identifiers

PMID38084304
PMCPMC10501421
OpenAlexW3118384332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.