ArticleCureus2023
Early Mammogram Screening's Impact on Early Breast Cancer Detection in Underserved Populations.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ghost in the Axilla: Luminal-Type Breast Cancer and Occult Sentinel Node Metastasis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Breast cancer remains a pressing public health challenge in the United States, ranking as one of the most prevalent cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. This study investigates the effectiveness of early mammogram screening in underserved populations. Methods Data from female patients receiving primary care at a tertiary hospital in Nashville between January 2022 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria encompassed females aged 40 or older with initial mammogram screenings before turning 50. Exclusions included genetically or environmentally related risk factors, cosmetic motivations, age above 50 at first screening, and screenings prompted by physical exams. Results Of 150 eligible women aged 40-49, the majority (n=121, 80.7%) had normal findings, 18.0% (n=27) had benign lesions, and 1.3% (n=2) had suspicious/malignant lesions. About 30.7% (n=46) underwent additional testing due to suspicious masses, with ultrasounds and diagnostic mammograms being common. The breast malignancy positivity rate was 1.33% (n=2) for the study population and 4.3% among those requiring additional testing. The positivity rate for the population of Black American descent is 1% (n=2), and for the Hispanic population, it is 6.25% (n=1). Discussion Breast cancer remains a significant concern, with disparities in screening guidelines and varying age of diagnosis. Overdiagnosis and false positives are challenges, with our study highlighting potential benefits in early screening, particularly for populations with unique risk factors, such as smokers. However, the study's limitations, including a small sample size and demographic bias, necessitate larger, more diverse studies to establish stronger correlations. Shared decision-making in early mammogram screening is emphasized. Conclusion Early mammogram screening in the 40-49 age group may detect breast cancer cases, but guidelines remain inconsistent. The study recommends early screening at age 40, with awareness of potential advantages and disadvantages. Larger, more comprehensive studies are needed to inform breast cancer screening practices better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.