ArticleCureus2023
Postoperative Closed-Suction Drain in Anterior Orbitotomy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orbital Subperiosteal Abscess Drainage: Transorbital vs. Endonasal Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the role of a closed-suction drain in orbital mass excision following anterior orbitotomy. Methods This is a prospective, randomized comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing anterior orbitotomy and mass excision enrolled into two groups: group A (with drain) and group B (without drain). Clinical data included visual acuity assessment, proptosis measured by exophthalmometry, pain score assessment, eyelid swelling, and ocular motility. Postoperative data were compared for one to five days and at 14 and 30-day follow-ups in the two groups to evaluate the efficacy of closed-suction drain in orbital mass excision. Results Twenty-five patients planned for anterior orbitotomy were divided into two groups: group A (drain, n = 12) and group B (without drain, n = 13). The subsidence of proptosis (p = 0.041), eyelid swelling (p = 0.04), and restoration of ocular motility (p = 0.04) were faster in the drain group as compared to the non-drain group, which was observed as statistically significant. The outcomes at 30 days were comparable in both groups and none of the patients developed any long-term complications. Conclusion The use of orbital drains aids early postoperative recovery with faster subsidence of proptosis and eyelid edema, and rapid recovery of ocular movements but does not affect the final outcome. Orbital surgeons can individualize the use of closed-suction drains after anterior orbitotomy in cases with expected postoperative edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.