Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084189›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Postoperative Closed-Suction Drain in Anterior Orbitotomy.

Pankaj Gupta, Manu Saini, Vijay K Sharma, Manpreet Singh, Khushdeep Abhaypal, Aditi Mehta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj GuptaOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Manu SainiOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Vijay K SharmaOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Manpreet SinghOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Khushdeep AbhaypalOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Aditi MehtaOphthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the role of a closed-suction drain in orbital mass excision following anterior orbitotomy. Methods This is a prospective, randomized comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing anterior orbitotomy and mass excision enrolled into two groups: group A (with drain) and group B (without drain). Clinical data included visual acuity assessment, proptosis measured by exophthalmometry, pain score assessment, eyelid swelling, and ocular motility. Postoperative data were compared for one to five days and at 14 and 30-day follow-ups in the two groups to evaluate the efficacy of closed-suction drain in orbital mass excision. Results Twenty-five patients planned for anterior orbitotomy were divided into two groups: group A (drain, n = 12) and group B (without drain, n = 13). The subsidence of proptosis (p = 0.041), eyelid swelling (p = 0.04), and restoration of ocular motility (p = 0.04) were faster in the drain group as compared to the non-drain group, which was observed as statistically significant. The outcomes at 30 days were comparable in both groups and none of the patients developed any long-term complications. Conclusion The use of orbital drains aids early postoperative recovery with faster subsidence of proptosis and eyelid edema, and rapid recovery of ocular movements but does not affect the final outcome. Orbital surgeons can individualize the use of closed-suction drains after anterior orbitotomy in cases with expected postoperative edema.

Indexed as

anterior orbitotomyclosed suctionorbital drainpost-operative oedemaproptosis

Identifiers

PMID38084189
PMCPMC10710846
OpenAlexW4388575705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.