ArticleJournal of optical microsystems2023
Characterizing close-focus lenses for microendoscopy.
Article in Journal of optical microsystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved endoscope for imaging and cell collection in the fallopian tubes.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Miniature 3D-printed rod-like refractive objective for endoscopic applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Extremely Compact 3D Printed Glass Ternary Diffractive Optical Element for Holographic Images.Advanced optical materials · 2025Article
- Integrated 3D printing of transparency-on-demand glass microstructure.Advanced optical materials · 2025Article
- Magnetically actuatable 3D-printed endoscopic microsystems.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Solvent-Free Silsesquioxane Self-Welding for 3D Printing Multi-Refractive Index Glass Objects.Advanced optical materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microendoscopes are commonly used in small lumens in the body, for which a focus near to the distal tip and ability to operate in an aqueous environment are paramount for navigation and disease detection. Commercially available distal optic systems below 1mm in diameter are severely limited, and custom micro lenses are generally very expensive. Gradient index of refraction (GRIN) singlets are available in small diameters but have limited optical performance adjustability. Three-dimensional (3D) printed monolithic optical systems are an emerging option that may be suitable for enabling high performance, close-focus imaging. In this manuscript, we compared the optical performance of three custom distal optic systems; a custom-pitch GRIN singlet, 3D-printed monolithic doublet, and 3D-printed monolithic triplet, with a nominal working distance (WD) of 1.5mm, 0.5mm and 0.4mm in 0.9% saline. These short WDs are ideal for microendoscopy in collapsed or flushed lumens such as pancreatic duct or fallopian tube. The GRIN singlet had performance limited only by the fiber bundle relay over 0.9mm to 1.6 mm depth of field (DOF). The 3D printed doublet was able to achieve a comparable DOF of 0.71mm, while the 3D printed triplet suffered the most limited DOF of 0.55mm. 3D printing enables flexible design of monolithic multi-element systems with aspheric surfaces of very short WDs and relative ease of integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.