Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084124›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2023

Advances in Conductive Hydrogel for Spinal Cord Injury Repair and Regeneration.

Cheng Qin, Zhiping Qi, Su Pan, Peng Xia, Weijian Kong, Bin Sun, Haorui Du, Renfeng Zhang, Longchuan Zhu, Dinghai Zhou and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. eLife · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheng QinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Zhiping QiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Su PanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-002X
Peng XiaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Weijian KongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Bin SunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Haorui DuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-1544
Renfeng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-8063-1682
Longchuan ZhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Dinghai ZhouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) treatment represents a major challenge in clinical practice. In recent years, the rapid development of neural tissue engineering technology has provided a new therapeutic approach for spinal cord injury repair. Implanting functionalized electroconductive hydrogels (ECH) in the injury area has been shown to promote axonal regeneration and facilitate the generation of neuronal circuits by reshaping the microenvironment of SCI. ECH not only facilitate intercellular electrical signaling but, when combined with electrical stimulation, enable the transmission of electrical signals to electroactive tissue and activate bioelectric signaling pathways, thereby promoting neural tissue repair. Therefore, the implantation of ECH into damaged tissues can effectively restore physiological functions related to electrical conduction. This article focuses on the dynamic pathophysiological changes in the SCI microenvironment and discusses the mechanisms of electrical stimulation/signal in the process of SCI repair. By examining electrical activity during nerve repair, we provide insights into the mechanisms behind electrical stimulation and signaling during SCI repair. We classify conductive biomaterials, and offer an overview of the current applications and research progress of conductive hydrogels in spinal cord repair and regeneration, aiming to provide a reference for future explorations and developments in spinal cord regeneration strategies.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationBiocompatible MaterialsHumansHydrogelsNerve RegenerationSpinal CordTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsconductive biomaterialselectrical signalelectrical stimulationneural tissue engineeringspinal cord injury microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38084124
PMCPMC10710813
OpenAlexW4389358991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.