Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38084053›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of older people nursing2024

Methods and approaches to facilitate inclusion of the views, perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research: A narrative systematic review.

Rachel Collins, Anthony Martyr, Anna Hunt, Catherine Quinn, Claire Pentecost, Julian C Hughes, Linda Clare

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of older people nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Using Design Thinking to Develop a Tool for Strengthening Nurses' Cultural Competence: Lessons Learned.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel CollinsCentre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3405-7932
Anthony MartyrCentre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-8902
Anna HuntCentre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7523-1792
Catherine QuinnCentre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9553-853X
Claire PentecostCentre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-5538
Julian C HughesPopulation Health Science Institute, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-0478
Linda ClareCentre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-5318

Funding

Alzheimer's Society AS-PR2-16-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perspectives of people with moderate-to-severe dementia are rarely directly elicited in research studies.

objectivesThis systematic review will explore methods and approaches for including the perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research.

methodsAgeLine, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science were searched until June 16 2022. Study quality was assessed using the 16-item Quality Assessment Tool. We described specific communication tools, reviewed the evidence for their effectiveness and considered their strengths and limitations. We examined the more general communication skills and techniques applied to support the use of these tools using thematic synthesis. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42019130386 and the review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

resultsSeven studies reported in 11 publications were included. In these studies five specific communication tools were used: Talking Mats, Augmentative and Alternative Communication Flexiboard, generic photographs in combination with a preference placement board, consultation ballot and personalised communication prescriptions. Each tool identified had advantages and disadvantages depending on dementia severity, verbal or physical ability, expense, researcher training requirements and ease of use. Thematic synthesis identified five general approaches to optimising communication that were employed to support use of the tools: ensuring conversations are individual and person-centred, managing external influences, engaging others, creating structure and facilitation skills.

conclusionAll tools had some utility and there was no clear evidence to support the recommendation of any one specific tool; therefore, researchers are advised to select the tool most appropriate to their context. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings offer general guidance for researchers and practitioners on how to facilitate communication with people with moderate-to-severe dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaCommunicationHumansAlzheimer's diseasecommunicationconversationinterview

Identifiers

PMID38084053
PMCPMC11475515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.