Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38083353›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2023

A Novel Explainable Fuzzy Clustering Approach for fMRI Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Analysis.

Charles A Ellis, Robyn L Miller, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles A Ellis
Robyn L Miller
Vince D Calhoun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) analysis has illuminated brain network interactions across many neuropsychiatric disorders. A common analysis approach involves using hard clustering methods to identify transitory states of brain activity, and in response to this, other methods have been developed to quantify the importance of specific dFNC interactions to identified states. Some of these methods involve perturbing individual features and examining the number of samples that switch states. However, only a minority of samples switch states. As such, these methods actually identify the importance of dFNC features to the clustering of a subset of samples rather than the overall clustering. In this study, we present a novel approach that more capably identifies the importance of each feature to the overall clustering. Our approach uses fuzzy clustering to output probabilities of each sample belonging to states and then measures their Kullback-Leibler divergence after perturbation. We show the viability of our approach in the context of schizophrenia (SZ) default mode network analysis, identifying significant differences in state dynamics between individuals with SZ and healthy controls. We further compare our approach with an existing approach, showing that it captures the effects of perturbation upon most samples. We also find that interactions between the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the anterior cingulate cortex and the PCC and precuneus are important across methods. We expect that our novel explainable clustering approach will enable further progress in rs-fMRI analysis and to other clustering applications.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSchizophreniaBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.