ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2023
Unsupervised Detection and Correction of Model Calibration Shift at Test-Time.
Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Keeping Medical AI Healthy and Trustworthy: A Review of Detection and Correction Methods for System Degradation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The wide adoption of predictive models into clinical practice require generalizability across hospitals and maintenance of consistent performance across time. Model calibration shift, caused by factors such as changes in prevalence rates or data distribution shift, can affect the generalizability of such models. In this work, we propose a model calibration detection and correction (CaDC) method, specifically designed to utilize only unlabeled data at a target hospital. The proposed method is very flexible and can be used alongside any deep learning-based clinical predictive model. As a case study, we focus on the problem of detecting and correcting model calibration shift in the context of early prediction of sepsis. Three patient cohorts consisting of 545,089 adult patients admitted to the emergency departments at three geographically diverse healthcare systems in the United States were used to train and externally validate the proposed method. We successfully show that utilizing the CaDC model can help assist the sepsis prediction model in achieving a predefined positive predictive value (PPV). For instance, when trained to achieve a PPV of 20%, the performance of the sepsis prediction model with and without the calibration shift estimation model was 18.0% vs 12.9% and 23.1% vs 13.4% at the two external validation cohorts, respectively. As such, the proposed CaDC method has potential applications in maintaining performance claims of predictive models deployed across hospital systems.Clinical relevance- Model generalizability is a requirement of wider adoption of clinical predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.