Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082899›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2023

Evaluating the partial contribution of the P3 event-related potential elicited by auditory oddball stimuli during the Stroop task.

Margaret M Swerdloff, Levi J Hargrove

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret M Swerdloff
Levi J Hargrove
Northwestern University · US

Funding

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND REHABILITATION OF NEURAL DYSFUNCTIONT32HD007418 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Levi John Hargrove · 1992 to 2026
$6.5M
NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD074184NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive load of a precisely timed task, such as the Stroop task, may be measured through the use of event-related potentials (ERPs). To determine the time at which cognitive load is at its peak, oddball tones may be applied at various times surrounding a cognitive task. However, we need to determine whether the simultaneous presentation of auditory and visual stimuli would mask a potential change in P3 in an ERP-producing task. If the contribution of the Stroop stimulus is too large, then Stroop ERP with oddball stimuli occurring at different timepoints may not be directly comparable across the various timepoints due to the contribution of the Stroop ERP. The aim of this study was to measure the magnitude of the difference wave between that of simultaneously presented stimuli and that of linearly added stimuli of separate responses. Participants were fitted with a dry-sensor EEG cap and were presented with a series of Stroop and auditory stimuli. For some Stroop stimuli, auditory stimuli occurred simultaneously or in a close time proximity to the Stroop stimuli. We sought to estimate the linear contribution of the ERP from Stroop and oddball stimuli. We found that the magnitude of the difference waves were 3.07 ± 1.65 μV and 2.82 ± 1.34 μV for congruent and incongruent stimuli, respectively. As the average amplitude in the P3 region for both the congruent and incongruent difference waves was lower than the magnitude of the auditory oddball presented simultaneously with Stroop stimuli (12.13 ± 1.00 μV for congruent and 11.78 ± 1.05 μV for incongruent Stroop), we expect that the contribution of P3 auditory oddball would not mask a potential Stroop effect even if the timing of the auditory oddball stimuli were experimentally manipulated, a direction that we hope to explore in future work. In conclusion, we determine this paradigm is suitable for measuring cognitive load in precisely timed tasks.Clinical Relevance- This study establishes the efficacy of presenting a Stroop task as a proxy for a cognitive challenge that could cause cognitive overload.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked PotentialsHumansReaction TimeStroop Test

Identifiers

PMID38082899
PMCPMC11795180
OpenAlexW4389542777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.