Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082421›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2023

Implementation strategies for hospital-based probiotic administration in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design for preventing hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection.

Lauren C Bresee, Nicole Lamont, Wrechelle Ocampo, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Deana Sabuda, Jenine Leal, Bruce Dalton, Jaime Kaufman, Bayan Missaghi, Joseph Kim and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lauren C BreseeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nicole LamontW21 Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Wrechelle OcampoW21 Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jayna Holroyd-LeducDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Deana SabudaPharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jenine LealDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Bruce DaltonPharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jaime KaufmanW21 Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Bayan MissaghiDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Joseph KimDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Oscar E LariosDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Elizabeth HendersonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maitreyi RamanDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jared R FletcherDepartment of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Peter FarisDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Scott KraftW21 Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ye ShenInfection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Thomas LouieDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
John M ConlyO'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. John.Conly@albertahealthservices.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3348-0157

Funding

Alberta Innovates' Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) Alberta Innovates' Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients, especially among older adults. Probiotics have been evaluated to prevent hospital-acquired (HA) CDI in patients who are receiving systemic antibiotics, but the implementation of timely probiotic administration remains a challenge. We evaluated methods for effective probiotic implementation across a large health region as part of a study to assess the real-world effectiveness of a probiotic to prevent HA-CDI (Prevent CDI-55 +).

methodsWe used a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial across four acute-care adult hospitals (n = 2,490 beds) to implement the use of the probiotic Bio-K + ® (Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285®, L. casei LBC80R® and L. rhamnosus CLR2®; Laval, Quebec, Canada) in patients 55 years and older receiving systemic antimicrobials. The multifaceted probiotic implementation strategy included electronic clinical decision support, local site champions, and both health care provider and patient educational interventions. Focus groups were conducted during study implementation to identify ongoing barriers and facilitators to probiotic implementation, guiding needed adaptations of the implementation strategy. Focus groups were thematically analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.

resultsA total of 340 education sessions with over 1,800 key partners and participants occurred before and during implementation in each of the four hospitals. Site champions were identified for each included hospital, and both electronic clinical decision support and printed educational resources were available to health care providers and patients. A total of 15 individuals participated in 2 focus group and 7 interviews. Key barriers identified from the focus groups resulted in adaptation of the electronic clinical decision support and the addition of nursing education related to probiotic administration. As a result of modifying implementation strategies for identified behaviour change barriers, probiotic adherence rates were from 66.7 to 75.8% at 72 h of starting antibiotic therapy across the four participating acute care hospitals.

conclusionsUse of a barrier-targeted multifaceted approach, including electronic clinical decision support, education, focus groups to guide the adaptation of the implementation plan, and local site champions, resulted in a high probiotic adherence rate in the Prevent CDI-55 + study.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionProbioticsAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsHospitalsHumansLactobacillus acidophilusAnti-Bacterial AgentsFocus groupHospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile InfectionOrder entryProbioticsProtocol implementation

Identifiers

PMID38082421
PMCPMC10714625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.