Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082351›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

A multicomponent intervention program to Prevent and Reduce AgItation and phySical rEstraint use in the ICU (PRAISE): study protocol for a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial.

Rens W J Kooken, Bram Tilburgs, Rob Ter Heine, Bart Ramakers, Mark van den Boogaard, PRAISE study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05783505 (PRevention of pAtient's agItation and Enhancement of Their SafEty), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05783505 narecruitingnot on this map

PRevention of pAtient's agItation and Enhancement of Their SafEty (PRAISE): Improving Intensive Care Treatment Using a Multicomponent Pharmacological Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2023 to 2026Enrolled480ConditionsAgitation,PsychomotorArmsMulticomponent intervention program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rens W J KookenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Rens.Kooken@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-9107
Bram TilburgsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Bram.Tilburgs@radboudumc.nl.
Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart RamakersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mark van den BoogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PRAISE study group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 10140302110007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical restraints remain to be commonly used in agitated intensive care unit (ICU) patients worldwide, despite a lack of evidence on efficacy and safety and reports of detrimental short and long-term consequences, such as prolonged delirium and a longer ICU length of stay. Physical restraint minimization approaches have focused mainly on educational strategies and other non-pharmacological interventions. Combining these interventions with goal-directed light sedation therapy if needed may play an important contributory role in further reducing the use of physical restraints. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention (MCI) program, combining person-centered non-pharmacological interventions with goal-directed light sedation, compared to physical restraints.

methodsA multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted in six Dutch ICUs. A power calculation based total of 480 (expected to become) agitated adult patients will be included in 26 months with a subsequent 2-year follow-up. Patients included in the control period will receive standard care with the current agitation management protocol including physical restraints. Patients included in the intervention period will be treated with the MCI program, consisting of four components, without physical restraints: education of ICU professionals, identification of patients at risk for agitation, formulation of a multidisciplinary person-centered care plan including non-pharmacological and medical interventions, and protocolized goal-directed light sedation using dexmedetomidine. Primary outcome is the number of days alive and outside of the ICU within 28 days after ICU admission. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay; 3-, 12-, and 24-month post-ICU quality of life; physical (fatigue, frailty, new physical problems), mental (anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder), and cognitive health; and 1-year cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial determining the effect of a combination of non-pharmacological interventions and light sedation using dexmedetomidine compared to physical restraints in agitated ICU patients. The results of this study, including long-term patient-centered outcomes, will provide relevant insights to aid ICU professionals in the management of agitated patients.

trial registrationNCT05783505, registration date 23 March 2023.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineAdultAnxietyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRestraint, PhysicalDexmedetomidineAgitationDexmedetomidineICUNon-pharmacological interventionsPatient-reported outcome measuresPhysical restraints

Identifiers

PMID38082351
PMCPMC10712112
OpenAlexW4389568741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.