Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082336›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2023

Metagenomic comparison of the faecal and environmental resistome on Irish commercial pig farms with and without zinc oxide and antimicrobial usage.

Daniel Ekhlas, José F Cobo Díaz, Raúl Cabrera-Rubio, Elena Alexa, Juan M Ortiz Sanjuán, Edgar Garcia Manzanilla, Fiona Crispie, Paul D Cotter, Finola C Leonard, Héctor Argüello and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel EkhlasDepartment of Food Safety, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
José F Cobo DíazDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Raúl Cabrera-RubioTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Elena AlexaDepartment of Food Safety, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
Juan M Ortiz SanjuánPig Development Department, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Edgar Garcia ManzanillaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Finola C LeonardSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Héctor ArgüelloAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Catherine M BurgessDepartment of Food Safety, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland. kaye.burgess@teagasc.ie.
University College Dublin · IEAPC Microbiome Institute · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversidad de León · ESUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Córdoba · ES

Funding

Teagasc 2018027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobials and heavy metals such as zinc oxide (ZnO) have been commonly used on Irish commercial pig farms for a 2-week period post-weaning to help prevent infection. In 2022, the prophylactic use of antimicrobials and ZnO was banned within the European Union due to concerns associated with the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and contamination of the environment with heavy metals. In this study, faecal and environmental samples were taken from piglets during the weaning period from ten commercial farms, of which five farms used antimicrobial or ZnO prophylaxis (AB-ZnO farms) and five which had not used antimicrobials or ZnO for the previous 3 years (AB-ZnO free farms). A total of 50 samples were compared using a metagenomic approach.

resultsThe results of this study showed some significant differences between AB-ZnO and AB-ZnO free farms and suggested positive selection for AMR under antimicrobial and ZnO treatment. Moreover, strong differences between environmental and faecal samples on farms were observed, suggesting that the microbiome and its associated mobile genetic elements may play a key role in the composition of the resistome. Additionally, the age of piglets affected the resistome composition, potentially associated with changes in the microbiome post-weaning.

conclusionsOverall, our study showed few differences in the resistome of the pig and its environment when comparing AB-ZnO farms with AB-ZnO free farms. These results suggest that although 3 years of removal of in-feed antimicrobial and ZnO may allow a reduction of AMR prevalence on AB-ZnO farms, more time, repeated sampling and a greater understanding of factors impacting AMR prevalence will be required to ensure significant and persistent change in on-farm AMR.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceHeavy metalsMetagenomicsResistomeSwineZinc oxide

Identifiers

PMID38082336
PMCPMC10712031
OpenAlexW4389564172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.