Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082326›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study-protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial.

Edward L Snyder, Michael E Sekela, Ian J Welsby, Yoshiya Toyoda, Mohamed Alsammak, Neel R Sodha, Thomas M Beaver, J Peter R Pelletier, James D Gorham, John S McNeil and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. It's in your blood: The impact of age, sex, genetic factors and exposures on stored red blood cell metabolism.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Edward L Snyder *Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael E Sekela *Gill Heart Institute University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Ian J WelsbyDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Yoshiya ToyodaTemple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mohamed AlsammakTemple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neel R SodhaRhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Thomas M BeaverUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Peter R PelletierUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
James D GorhamUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
John S McNeilUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Roman M SniecinskiEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ronald G PearlStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gregory A NuttallMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ravi SarodeUniversity of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
T Brett ReeceUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
Alesia KaplanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Robertson D DavenportUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tina S IpeOur Blood Institute, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Peyman BenharashUCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ileana Lopez-PlazaHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Richard R GammonScientific, Medical and Technical and Research Department, OneBlood, Orlando, FL, USA.
Patrick SadlerCentral California Blood Center, Fresno, CA, USA.
John P PitmanCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Kathy LiuCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Stanley BentowCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Laurence CorashCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Nina MuftiCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Jeanne VarroneCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA.
Richard J BenjaminCerus Corporation, 1220 Concord Ave, Concord, CA, 94520, USA. rbenjamin@cerus.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-4744
for the ReCePI study group
Cerus (United States) · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOklahoma Blood Institute · USOneBlood · USProvidence College · USStanford University · USTemple University Health System · USTemple University Hospital · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Michigan · USVitalant · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies.

methodsReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (> 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. DISCUSSION: RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnemiaCardiac Surgical ProceduresAcridinesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicErythrocytesGlutathioneHumansHypoxiaMulticenter Studies as TopicNitrogen Mustard CompoundsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcridinesGlutathioneNitrogen Mustard Compounds(N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl))-2-aminoethyl-3-((acridin-9-yl)amino)propionateAcute kidney injuryAmustaline/GSHCardiac surgeryINTERCEPTPathogen reductionRandomized controlled trialTransfusion-transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID38082326
PMCPMC10712151
OpenAlexW4389551999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.