Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082293›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

"Diving in the deep-end and swimming": a mixed methods study using normalization process theory to evaluate a learning collaborative approach for the implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis centers.

Laura M Holdsworth, Margaret Stedman, Erika Saliba Gustafsson, Jialin Han, Steven M Asch, Glenda Harbert, Karl A Lorenz, Dale E Lupu, Elizabeth Malcolm, Alvin H Moss and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04125537 (Pathways Project Collaborative Phase II), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04125537 completednot on this map

Pathways Project Collaborative Phase II: Implementation of Kidney Supportive Care in Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled476ConditionsKidney Diseases, Chronic Kidney Diseases, End Stage Renal Disease, End Stage Renal Disease on DialysisArmsIHI Breakthrough Collaborative Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M HoldsworthDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3180 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. l.holdsworth@stanford.edu.
Margaret StedmanDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Erika Saliba GustafssonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3180 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Jialin HanDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Steven M AschDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3180 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Glenda HarbertSchool of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Karl A LorenzDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3180 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Dale E LupuSchool of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Elizabeth MalcolmDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Alvin H MossCenter for Health Ethics and Law, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Amanda NicklasSchool of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Manjula Kurella TamuraDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
George Washington University · USStanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USDuke University · USStanford Health Care · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation 139736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNormalization Process Theory (NPT) is an implementation theory that can be used to explain how and why implementation strategies work or not in particular circumstances. We used it to understand the mechanisms that lead to the adoption and routinization of palliative care within hemodialysis centers.

methodsWe employed a longitudinal, mixed methods approach to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of palliative care practices among ten hemodialysis centers participating in an Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough- Series learning collaborative. Qualitative methods included longitudinal observations of collaborative activities, and interviews with implementers at the end of the study. We used an inductive and deductive approach to thematic analysis informed by NPT constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, reflexive monitoring) and implementation outcomes. The NoMAD survey, which measures NPT constructs, was completed by implementers at each hemodialysis center during early and late implementation.

resultsThe four mechanisms posited in NPT had a dynamic and layered relationship during the implementation process. Collaborative participants participated because they believed in the value and legitimacy of palliative care for patients receiving hemodialysis and thus had high levels of cognitive participation at the start. Didactic Learning Sessions were important for building practice coherence, and sense-making was solidified through testing new skills in practice and first-hand observation during coaching visits by an expert. Collective action was hampered by limited time among team members and practical issues such as arranging meetings with patients. Reflexive monitoring of the positive benefit to patient and family experiences was key in shifting mindsets from disease-centric towards a patient-centered model of care. NoMAD survey scores showed modest improvement over time, with collective action having the lowest scores.

conclusionsNPT was a useful framework for understanding the implementation of palliative care practices within hemodialysis centers. We found a nonlinear relationship among the mechanisms which is reflected in our model of implementation of palliative care practices through a learning collaborative. These findings suggest that the implementation of complex practices such as palliative care may be more successful through iterative learning and practice opportunities as the mechanisms for change are layered and mutually reinforcing.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04125537 . Registered 14 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

DivingPalliative CareDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesSwimmingCollaborativeEnd-stage kidney diseaseHemodialysisMixed methodsNormalization process theoryPalliative carePractice change

Identifiers

PMID38082293
PMCPMC10712060
OpenAlexW4389560566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.