Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082287›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Institutional trust is a distinct construct related to vaccine hesitancy and refusal.

Sekoul Krastev, Oren Krajden, Zoua M Vang, Fernanda Pérez-Gay Juárez, Elizaveta Solomonova, Maya J Goldenberg, Daniel Weinstock, Maxwell J Smith, Esme Dervis, Dan Pilat and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What polio can learn from leprosy.BMC global and public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. "Just be honest with us": A qualitative analysis of Canadians' public trust during the COVID-19 pandemic.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sekoul KrastevIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Oren KrajdenFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zoua M VangDepartment of Sociology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Fernanda Pérez-Gay JuárezDepartment of Philosophy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Elizaveta SolomonovaNeurophilosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maya J GoldenbergDepartment of Philosophy, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Daniel WeinstockFaculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maxwell J SmithSchool of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Esme DervisDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Dan PilatThe Decision Lab, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ian GoldDepartment of Philosophy & Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. ian.gold@mcgill.ca.

Funding

CIHR GA3-177727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy is driven by a heterogeneous and changing set of psychological, social and historical phenomena, requiring multidisciplinary approaches to its study and intervention. Past research has brought to light instances of both interpersonal and institutional trust playing an important role in vaccine uptake. However, no comprehensive study to date has specifically assessed the relative importance of these two categories of trust as they relate to vaccine behaviors and attitudes.

methodsIn this paper, we examine the relationship between interpersonal and institutional trust and four measures related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and one measure related to general vaccine hesitancy. We hypothesize that, across measures, individuals with vaccine hesitant attitudes and behaviors have lower trust-especially in institutions-than those who are not hesitant. We test this hypothesis in a sample of 1541 Canadians.

resultsA deficit in both interpersonal and institutional trust was associated with higher levels of vaccine hesitant attitudes and behaviors. However, institutional trust was significantly lower than interpersonal trust in those with high hesitancy scores, suggesting that the two types of trust can be thought of as distinct constructs in the context of vaccine hesitancy.

conclusionsBased on our findings, we suggest that diminished institutional trust plays a crucial role in vaccine hesitancy. We propose that this may contribute to a tendency to instead place trust in interpersonally propagated belief systems, which may be more strongly misaligned with mainstream evidence and thus support vaccine hesitancy attitudes. We offer strategies rooted in these observations for creating public health messages designed to enhance vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesTrustVaccination HesitancyCanadaHumansNorth American PeopleVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesConspiracy theoriesCOVID-19Global healthHealth communicationInstitutional trustPublic healthPublic trust in scienceVaccine hesitancyVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID38082287
PMCPMC10714562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.