Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082249›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Development of birth weight estimation model for Ethiopian population from sonographic evaluation.

Nejat Mohammed Seman, Hamdia Murad Adem, Fanta Assefa Disasa, Gizeaddis Lamesgin Simegn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nejat Mohammed SemanBiomedical Imaging Unit, School of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Hamdia Murad AdemBiomedical Imaging Unit, School of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Fanta Assefa DisasaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jimma Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Gizeaddis Lamesgin SimegnBiomedical Imaging Unit, School of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. gizeaddis.lamesgin@ju.edu.et.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-4555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal birth weight (FBW) estimation involves predicting the weight of a fetus prior to delivery. This prediction serves as a crucial input for ensuring effective, accurate, and appropriate obstetric planning, management, and decision-making. Typically, there are two methods used to estimate FBW: the clinical method (which involves measuring fundal height and performing abdominal palpation) or sonographic evaluation. The accuracy of clinical method estimation relies heavily on the experience of the clinician. Sonographic evaluation involves utilizing various mathematical models to estimate FBW, primarily relying on fetal biometry. However, these models often demonstrate estimation errors that exceed acceptable levels, which can result in inadequate labor and delivery management planning. One source of this estimation error is sociodemographic variations between population groups in different countries. Additionally, inter- and intra-observer variability during fetal biometry measurement also contributes to errors in FBW estimation.

methodsIn this research, a novel mathematical model was proposed through multiple regression analysis to predict FBW with an accepted level of estimation error. To develop the model, population data consisting of fetal biometry, fetal ultrasound images, obstetric variables, and maternal sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, ethnicity, educational status, occupational status, income, etc.) of the mother were collected. Two approaches were used to develop the mathematical model. The first method was based on fetal biometry data measured by a physician and the second used fetal biometry data measured using an image processing algorithm. The image processing algorithm comprises preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, and fetal biometry measurement.

resultsThe model developed using the two approaches were tested to assess their performance in estimating FBW, and they achieved mean percentage errors of 7.53% and 5.89%, respectively. Based on these results, the second model was chosen as the final model.

conclusionThe findings indicate that the developed model can estimate FBW with an acceptable level of error for the Ethiopian population. Furthermore, this model outperforms existing models for FBW estimation. The proposed approach has the potential to reduce infant and maternal mortality rates by providing accurate fetal birth weight estimates for informed obstetric planning.

Indexed as

Fetal WeightUltrasonography, PrenatalBiometryBirth WeightFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansPregnancyFBW estimationMathematical modelMultiple linear regressionSonographic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38082249
PMCPMC10714654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.