Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082221›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2023

Efficient pathway for men fertility preservation in testicular cancer or lymphoma: a cross-sectional study of national 2018 data.

Ségolène Prades, Sarah-Lyne Jos, Jacqueline Saïas-Magnan, Louis Bujan, Florence Eustache, Oxana Blagosklonov, Eric Lechevallier, Florence Brugnon, Vanessa Loup-Cabaniols, Dorian Bosquet and 23 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Ségolène PradesCECOS/Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France.
Sarah-Lyne JosCECOS/Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France.
Jacqueline Saïas-MagnanCECOS/Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France.
Louis BujanDEFE (Développement Embryonnaire, Fertilité, Environnement) INSERM, Universités Montpellier Et Toulouse 3, CECOS Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, 1202, Toulouse, France.
Florence EustacheCECOS, Site Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, Bondy, France.
Oxana BlagosklonovService de Biologie Et Medecine de La Reproduction, Cryobiologie-CECOS, CHRU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Eric LechevallierService d'Urologie et Transplantation Rénale, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Florence Brugnon1240 IMOST, INSERM, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Vanessa Loup-CabaniolsCECOS Languedoc Roussillon, MONTPELLIER Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.
Dorian BosquetService de Médecine Et Biologie de la Reproduction - CECOS-CHU Amiens Picardie - Site Sud, Amiens, France.
Marie PradesService de Biologie de La Reproduction-CECOS, Hôpital Tenon (AP-HP), Sorbonne-Université, 75020, PARIS, France.
Bérengère DucrocqInstitut de Biologie de la Reproduction - CECOS Hôpital Calmette, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
Céline ChalasLaboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction-CECOS, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.Centre Université Paris-Cité, GHU Cochin, Paris, France.
Sandrine Giscard-d'EstaingBiologie de La Reproduction, U1208, Hospices Civil de Lyon, HFME, Inserm, Bron, France.
Anne MayeurReproductive Biology Department, CECOS, Paris-Saclay University, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, APHP, Clamart, France.
Isabelle KoscinskyNGERE (Nutrition Génétique Et Exposition Aux Risques Environnementaux) INSERM 1256 Université de Lorraine, 10 Avenue de La Forêt de Haye, 54505, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
Françoise SchmittCECOS ALSACE Mulhouse Groupe Hospitalier, de La Région de Mulhouse Et Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France.
Aline Papaxanthos-RocheBiology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marius TeletinInstitut de Génétique Et de Biologie Moléculaire Et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Université́ de Strasbourg, France-LBDR-CECOS, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), , Strasbourg, France.
Emmanuelle ThibaultLaboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction - CECOS Hôpital L'Archet 2 - CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Damien BeauvillardCHU Brest, AMP CECOS, Brest, France.
Sophie MirallieService de Médecine Et Biologie de La Reproduction, CHU Nantes, France.
Béatrice DelepineService de Biologie de La Reproduction Reims - Pôle de Biologie Médicale Et Pathologie, Reims, France.
Annie BenhaimService de Biologie de La Reproduction Coordinatrice Clinico-Biologique du Centre d'AMP du CHU de Caen Pôle de Biologie-CHU, Caen, France.
Pascale May-PanloupBiologie de La Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire & Univ Angers, INSERM, CNRS, MITOVASC, Equipe MitoLab, SFR ICAT, 49000, Angers, France.
Ségolène VeauService de Biologie de La Reproduction-CECOS, CHU Rennes - Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France.
Cynthia FrapsauceService de Médecine Et de Biologie de La Reproduction-CECOS, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Patricia FauqueBurgundy University, INSERM 1231, Dijon, France.
Régis CostelloService d'Hématologie Et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital La Conception, Assistance Publique Des Hôpitaux de Marseille, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Nathalie RivesNorDiC UMR 1239, team "Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology", Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, Univ Rouen Normandie, Inserm, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Catherine Metzler-GuillemainCECOS/Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France.
Jeanne PerrinCECOS/Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille, France. Jeanne.perrin@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-4886
CECOS network
Inserm · FRHôpital de la Conception · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRGroupe Hospitalier de la Région de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace · FRHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRInstitut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire · FRPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 15-49 years-old men, the main cancers are testicular cancer (TC) and lymphomas (L): freezing of ejaculated sperm is primarily used for male fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. Our objective was to analyze the French FP rate in 15-49 years-old men diagnosed with TC or L in 2018. We designed a national descriptive cross-sectional study of sperm banking rate in men with a diagnosis of TC, Hodgkin L (HL) or non-Hodgkin L (NHL). From the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) 2018 data, we extracted the estimated incidence of TC and L in metropolitan France. From the 2018 activity report of CECOS network (Centers for Study and Banking of Eggs and Sperm), we extracted the number of men with TC or L who banked ejaculated sperm. We estimated the proportion of 15-49 years-old men diagnosed with TC or L who banked sperm.

resultsAmong 15-49 years-old men, INCa estimated 38,048 new cancer diagnoses in metropolitan France in 2018: 2,630 TC and 3,913 L (943 HL and 2,970 NHL). The CECOS network provided data from 26/27 metropolitan centers (96% response rate): 1,079 sperm banking for men with TC, 375 for HL and 211 for NHL. We estimated that the 2018 sperm banking rate in France was 41% for TC, 40% for HL, and 7% for NHL.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, our paper is the first cross-sectional study with multicenter and national data analyzing FP rate in cancer men: it suggests an efficient pathway for men to FP before cancer treatment, compared to previously published studies. Although sperm banking rate in 15-49 years-old men could definitely be improved, further studies should evaluate the information given to patients before gonadotoxic treatments, the factors associated with the absence of sperm banking and whether this lack of referral induces a loss of chance for these men.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaChemotherapyFatherhoodOncofertilityRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38082221
PMCPMC10714657
OpenAlexW4389579875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.