Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082110›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2025

New Approaches to Addiction Treatment Based on Learning and Memory.

Patrick Bach, Falk Kiefer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick BachDepartment of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Falk KieferDepartment of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. Falk.Kiefer@zi-mannheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies suggest that physiological learning processes are similar to changes observed in addiction at the molecular, neuronal and structural levels. Based on the importance of classical and instrumental conditioning in the development and maintenance of addictive disorders, many have suggested cue-exposure-based extinction training of conditioned, drug-related responses as a potential treatment of addiction. Recently, the development of virtual reality-assisted cue-exposure treatment has put forward new approaches to extinction training. Recent data indicated that it may also be possible to facilitate this extinction training through pharmacological interventions that strengthen memory consolidation during cue exposure. Another potential therapeutic intervention is based on the so-called reconsolidation theory. According to this hypothesis, already-consolidated memories return to a labile state when reactivated, allowing them to undergo another phase of consolidation - reconsolidation - which can be interfered with by pharmacological and behavioural interventions. These approaches suggest that the extinction of drug-related memories may represent a viable treatment strategy in the future treatment of addiction.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveExtinction, PsychologicalLearningMemorySubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsCuesHumansMemory ConsolidationAddictionCue exposureDependenceExtinctionLTPReconsolidationRewardVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.