Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38082064›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2024

Alternative therapeutic strategies to treat antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Craig R MacNair, Steven T Rutherford, Man-Wah Tan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Adaptive Response ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Phospholipid-Coated FeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Craig R MacNairDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-438X
Steven T RutherfordDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-4248
Man-Wah TanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. tan.man-wah@gene.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance threatens to render antibiotics - which are essential for modern medicine - ineffective, thus posing a threat to human health. The discovery of novel classes of antibiotics able to overcome resistance has been stalled for decades, with the developmental pipeline relying almost entirely on variations of existing chemical scaffolds. Unfortunately, this approach has been unable to keep pace with resistance evolution, necessitating new therapeutic strategies. In this Review, we highlight recent efforts to discover non-traditional antimicrobials, specifically describing the advantages and limitations of antimicrobial peptides and macrocycles, antibodies, bacteriophages and antisense oligonucleotides. These approaches have the potential to stem the tide of resistance by expanding the physicochemical property space and target spectrum occupied by currently approved antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.